Summary: My 10 cents short and dense: Just like many others have commented, I find the game play is a little too short and it's annoying when your player automatically take cover. I paid $19.99 and I think that's value for money, but I wouldn't have paid more. Others have recommended Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Las Vegas - I will probably buy that.
Summary: Obviously a first-class production, but alot of aspects I just hated in terms of "look and feel." Third-person felt awkward as the guy's body takes up most of the screen. First person also felt awkward because you couldn't see the gun. Targeting system felt overdone and awkward. Too much red/green crap on your screen, you can't really see anything, in the middle of a firefight you see red crap all over your screen, too much "computerized" combat not enough about the art...
Summary: 1 of the most realistic military shooters out.this is not like call of duty.This is for military tactics type of gamers.No gun n gun.i love this game.This is just as good as call of duty.graphics arent as good but alot of weapons.A MUST HAVE
Summary: I played Call of Duty: Modern warfare first, so playing ghost recon was actually a let down in terms of realism. I got ghost recon knowing it was an earlier game and so I was already half expecting the game to not be anything like COD:modern warfare but I hopeful!! I played ghost recon for awhile but then put it aside and have not finished the game yet, I imagine I will get to it one day.
Summary: I have been playing Cal of Duty 2, 3 & 4 so I thought Ghost Recon would be a good side fight but so far I haven't been able to reverse the up and down gun controls like in Call of Duty and I haven't gotten out of training yet. It ain't as usuer friendly as the Call of Duty games...
I do not at all care for the "co-op" mode in this game
R. McAdams, Amazon
12 June 2009
Summary: This game advertises itself as a local system co-op game. That is confirmed on the official xbox.com website as well. However, when you get the game and pop it in with your buddy sitting next to you ready to play, get ready to be disappointed. The "co-op" mode for the game is NOT, I repeat NOT the single player campaign.
Conclusion: The Single Player is excellent, albeit fairly short with some excellent set pieces, unfortunately the degredation of the game play and functionality in mulitplayer mode is very disappointing and cannot compete with games like Call of Duty 2/4.
Summary: I kind of have a love/hate relationship with sequels. When a game is great and they make a sequel one of three things can happen: 1. The sequel just stinks it up, 2. The sequel is more of the same, or 3. The sequel improves upon an already great formula. Obviously, option 1 is bad and option 3 is great. But most sequels (GRAW2 included) fall in option 2 with hints of 1 and 3.