www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

The Lord of the Rings: Conquest
5.9 out of 10

The Lord of the Rings: Conquest

The Lord of the Rings: Conquest The Lord of the Rings: Conq Read more

Great Deal: $79.95

Reviews and Problems with The Lord of the Rings: Conquest

Showing 1-10 of 22
Overall 4
4.0

A good time waster

Sven Slotlochivich, Amazon
9 May 2011
  • Summary: I purchased LotR Conquest because I was looking for an xbox 360 equivalent to Starwars Battlefront. While Battlefront is a sensational game, LotR Conquest is not. Let's start with the singleplayer. It's sometimes fun, mostly easy, and sometimes frustrating.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Online is no longer online....

Robert Bartholomew, Amazon
24 April 2010
  • Summary: In a nutshell this game was pretty much like any hack n slash game like samurai warriors or a lord of the rings version of star wars battlefront. Sadly most of this game fun was within the online section of this game for the campaign mode is about 3 hours long if that.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

I hope someone got fired over this

Ronin Dave "Far be it for Logic to Stand in t..., Amazon
17 December 2009
  • Summary: Relive the epic battles of the War of the Ring in a not so epic game which follows the campaigns of forces of good from Helm's Deep to the Black Gate of Mordor. You can also play an alternative timeline where Sauron conquers all. If it weren't the LOTR, I'd probably loathe this game.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Another one bites the dust!

govols7089, Ebay
15 December 2009
  • Summary: EA STOP MAKING GAMES! I had my hopes up on this game and what do you know EA destorys another title. Don't waste your money on this game. Although if your 5 years old you may think it rules the world. Can somebody remake all the LOTR games please and make them worth playing.
  • Read full review
  • See Product at eBay ($79.95)
Overall 4
4.0

boring

Lisa E. Gunn "Matt", Amazon
11 July 2009
  • Summary: this game is very upsetting. one thing is that they give you and enemy units a large amount of health which makes it take a long time to kill each person but in the star wars battlefront series they gave everyone a resonable amount of health.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

So much potential.

Seenoht, Amazon
13 April 2009
  • Summary: I bought a used version of this game locally and wound up taking it back a few days later after having played through every level. I am a huge fan of Star Wars: Battlefront and, after having just read LOTR for the first time, was really stoked to play this.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Lord of the Rings Conquest

demontracker, Ebay
21 February 2009
  • Summary: If you are a lover of the Lord of the Rings anything then this game sounds cool. In reality it is not. The enemies are over powered leaving you to frantically attempt to run between the ranks of warriors. The camera is clunky and you will die most often because of that reason.
  • Read full review
  • See Product at eBay ($79.95)
Overall 4
4.0

don't let the demo fool you

Angryman, Amazon
10 February 2009
  • Summary: Um, where to begin. I downloaded the demo and completely loved it. Like other reviewers noted, it's like the star wars battlefront series. but unlike battlefront 2, there is not a time limit on your hero (that was the lamest thing about BF2 - sorry I digress). Anyway, the demo completely fooled me.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Not what I had expected...

skymontana559, Ebay
6 February 2009
  • Summary: The game play itself isn't bad. But I had expected this to be a LOTR type version of Star Wars Battlefront. It is not. You have a set amount of lives, there is no capturing areas aside from doing it for mission objectives.
  • Read full review
  • See Product at eBay ($79.95)
Overall 4
4.0

Started out with battlefront and took out the fun

C. Bongard "SterlingKnight", Amazon
1 February 2009
  • Summary: he term horrible gets thrown around a lot but in this case it deserves it and so much more. Its one of the worst games I have ever played and am shocked that must reviewers gave it between a 3 and a 4.
  • Read full review
Next page >>