www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

The Lord of the Rings: Conquest
5.8 out of 10

The Lord of the Rings: Conquest

The Lord of the Rings: Conquest The Lord of the Rings: Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with The Lord of the Rings: Conquest

Showing 1-10 of 26
Overall 4
4.0

User Review

etb444, Metacritic
28 December 2013
  • Summary: The Lord of the Rings: Conquest is a great example of why you definitely shouldn't get your hopes up for a game based off a movie/book. This game is a complete button-masher and the story should have been good because it is LOTR, but the characters had absolutely no emotion.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Online is no longer online....

Robert Bartholomew, Amazon
17 March 2009
  • Summary: In a nutshell this game was pretty much like any hack n slash game like samurai warriors or a lord of the rings version of star wars battlefront. Sadly most of this game fun was within the online section of this game for the campaign mode is about 3 hours long if that.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

don't let the demo fool you

Angryman, Amazon
17 March 2009
  • Summary: Um, where to begin. I downloaded the demo and completely loved it. Like other reviewers noted, it's like the star wars battlefront series. but unlike battlefront 2, there is not a time limit on your hero (that was the lamest thing about BF2 - sorry I digress). Anyway, the demo completely fooled me.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

So much potential.

Seenoht, Amazon
17 March 2009
  • Summary: I bought a used version of this game locally and wound up taking it back a few days later after having played through every level. I am a huge fan of Star Wars: Battlefront and, after having just read LOTR for the first time, was really stoked to play this.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

boring

Lisa E. Gunn, Amazon
17 March 2009
  • Summary: this game is very upsetting. one thing is that they give you and enemy units a large amount of health which makes it take a long time to kill each person but in the star wars battlefront series they gave everyone a resonable amount of health.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

A good time waster

Sven Slotlochivich, Amazon
17 March 2009
  • Summary: I purchased LotR Conquest because I was looking for an xbox 360 equivalent to Starwars Battlefront. While Battlefront is a sensational game, LotR Conquest is not. Let's start with the singleplayer. It's sometimes fun, mostly easy, and sometimes frustrating.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Started out with battlefront and took out the fun

C. Bongard, Amazon
16 March 2009
  • Summary: he term horrible gets thrown around a lot but in this case it deserves it and so much more. Its one of the worst games I have ever played and am shocked that must reviewers gave it between a 3 and a 4.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

I hope someone got fired over this

Ronin Dave, Amazon
16 March 2009
  • Summary: Relive the epic battles of the War of the Ring in a not so epic game which follows the campaigns of forces of good from Helm's Deep to the Black Gate of Mordor. You can also play an alternative timeline where Sauron conquers all. If it weren't the LOTR, I'd probably loathe this game.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Conquest is conquered

Doug A. Benefied, Amazon
16 March 2009
  • Summary: I really don't see how anyone could give this game a very high score. First off, the single player is pretty cool, but really short. The game has very nice graphics and the combat mechanics are pretty good. The balance of the game is the worse. Certain characters are much stronger than others.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

A Huge Disappointment

Paul Mariano, Amazon
16 March 2009
  • Summary: I will start off by saying that I am a HUGE Lord of the Rings fan. When I heard about this game I was so excited. I was a huge fan of Battlefront and I was under the impression that combing the concept with LOTR would be great. Boy was I wrong.
  • Read full review
Next page >>