This was a decently fun game but I did find myself getting bored with ...
7 December 2014
Summary: This was a decently fun game but I did find myself getting bored with the repetitiveness of it. I'll break it down into pros&cons. PROS -If you like the sniper type character builds in most games this will be a fun experience. Worth it if the cost is only a few dollars.
Summary: I have a love hate relationship with this game. It's really more of a shooting simulator. (With some if the physics exaggerated in my opinion.) Which makes it exponentially more fun than any of the sniper games I've played in the past. But the game play seemed very straight forward.
Summary: I like WW2 games and this one sort of filled the bill for awhile. Kind of a short story though. I finished the game on "easy" within two days and I am not a hard core gamer. The design of the bullet impact was kind of cool and is kind of worth the purchase alone.
Summary: I like the idea of a sniper game and the missions are fun. The main thing I'm not fond of is the engine. You tab a button and they guy moves a lot! Also the cheesiness of some aspects as well. Such as how to destroy a tank. They are so easy and the gas cap idea is stupid.
Summary: Got this one due to recommendations. It was good for the price. The game itself has a great premise and the story is typical "go to this scene, take out the bad guys, do the stuff." Couple of things that could have made this OK game a great game. 1.) The game is VERY linear.
Summary: This game appears to use the Assassins Creed engine and it's frustrating cover/detection system? Although I like some of the gameplay, I am really bummed about some rookie mistakes made when designing the game. 1.
Summary: To stand out in the crowd of shooters available in recent years, you have to have a unique selling point. This could be the physics based wonder of the ‘Half Life’ series, the sublime co-op of ‘Left 4 Dead 2’, or the creation of a rich and luxurious world like ‘Bioshock’.