Reviews and Problems with Medal of Honor: Warfighter
Showing 1-10 of 56
A Great Military Shooter
FlyinWithSilent1 , GameStop
30 December 2013
Summary: Title: Medal of Honor Warfighter Genre: Shooter Rating: 6/10 Singleplayer: It is short and sweet. This campaign is a lot more realistic than Call of Duty. Unfortunately it only takes around 5 hours to complete. Gameplay is nice and smooth. The ending was one of the best. Multiplayer: Nothing that innovative here, There are different classes that provide different experiences. Overall, it is your average multiplayer with your standard modes.
Summary: so first off this games campaign is ok but multiplayer is really fun grenade explosions are way better than the first one but the graphics of like the guns are some weird stuff..lol but overall good game if your not a cod fanboy and like fps shooters pick this game up!
Summary: This game has been declared a failure by EA but I would recommend it if you are a fan of Call of Duty and Battlefield. It is kind of like a hybrid between the two giant franchises. The gun-play is OK but the graphics and story are amazing. For $20 I would highly recommend this game to everyone.
Summary: This is a good game I really enjoyed itcouldn't have been better in my opinion. Well one thing they could really fix is the multiplayer servers and that is pretty much it. The campaign was amazing though multplayer is good but servers need to be fixed NOW!
Summary: I heard that this game received very bad reviews from gamers and critics alike. I was a bit hesitant to pick this game up because of those reviews, but when I started to play it, I was unsure why the game was criticized for being a bad game. In my opinion, this game is fairly good, this game could be better, but it's not like that other shooters set the bar high (Only BF3 does). The campaign is fairly good as well as the multiplayer.