Summary: Given that this game used Frostbite, just as Battlefield 3, I had high hopes for it. Sadly, soon I realized that it was not going to be as fun. The campaign is OK. If you have a nice hometheater, maybe you'll enjoy it since the audio is actually good.
Summary: Hooray: 1. Game mechanics were decent. I liked shooting at cars and watching the bullets ping off and ricochet. 2. Graphically it was akin to Battlefield 3, which is strong. Meh: 1. AI was passable, but not challenging enough. 2. Room clearing...no need for this.
Summary: Medal of Honor: Warfighter isn't a bad game. It really isn't. Unfortunately, it isn't a good one either. Even though the basic shooting mechanics are pretty solid, the campaign is suspiciously short, even for an FPS. What is wrong with Warfighter?
Fire teams make it fun, but the interest factor is lacking and you'll be on BF before long.
16 March 2013
Excerpt: Please NOTE, this is my article as written for www.ConsoleMonster.com where I am a reviewer. ------------------- EA are looking to once again thwart COD's attempts of domination in the shooter genre of gaming.
Conclusion: When I first heard the announcement that a sequel to MoH was to be released I was very excited. I eagerly anticipated what it would be like ,with "baited breath" !! I prayed it would have a much longer campaign, better graphics and a much neater multi-player layout.
Conclusion: single player far to short, the A.I is a joke and the mulitplayer is no different from call of duty. singler player = 4/10. muiltplayer =4/10. ill be trading warfighter in to get some money for assassins creed 3 that is how much i dislike this game.