Summary: This game has good things and bad things so this review will be in pros and cons format. Pros: Very cheap at retail. Fairly realistic (as far as damage taken/death) in a war setting (besides the "revive" stuff). Graphics are okay. Story and settings are fairly interesting. Cons: Partner AI is ridiculously bad (doesn't do what you tell him to do). Enemy AI is too high even on the lower difficulty settings. Graphics (while being okay) are dated and fairly grainy.
Coop on couch. Unfortunately, you'll find yourself leaving the couch.
3 July 2011
Summary: Well I played the first level of this game so I'm not the most qualified to review this title, but I will try. The graphics leave a lot to be desired but it is a little bit older game. The gameplay itself is pretty linear. The controls are not very good. It's difficult to aim which makes this game a little less fun. The enemies are pretty generic and the game is pretty generic. The main characters are just two guys they pull from a action movie. One is sneaky and snipes.
Summary: Ironically, my favorite XBox games of all time are the original Conflict series games... Desert Storm, Global Terror, etc. I don't know what they were thinking when they made this game. It takes too many steps backward. I play strictly single-player. I like being able to position my players where I want them.
Summary: This game could have been a lot of fun if it weren't for the insanely stupid team AI. I don't recommend this game unless you just want to play in multiplayer mode to override the AI issues. I had multiple situations where I commanded my teammate AI to cover an area and everytime while I was reloading an enemy ran right by him and killed me and he never turned to fire at the enemy.
Summary: I've played every conflict game that ever came out for the regular xbox, and when I saw this one coming out for the xbox 360, I couldn't wait to play it. However, it has to be the WORST conflict game that has ever been produced. Literally 25min into playing it, a friend of mine and myself, stopped playing it, and decided to play something else. Thats how bad it is. The other conflict games, are well worth playing though, too bad this one had to be such a "dud".
Summary: So sad...this WAS one of the most fun franchises ever made. Although Conflict: Vietnam was a little weak, the others were fantastic. I loved Global Terror and hoped they would continue in that fine tradition. They didn't...not only that, but they foolishly jumped on the FPS bandwagon instead of keeping it third person. If I wanted another first person shooter, there are many of them that are a hundred times better.
Excerpt: The game itself wasnt too bad. However, the only reason I rented it was for on-line co-op with my friend; with a high difficulty setting, even on easy - and absolutely no checkpoints!!! - it was impossible. If you both die (which happens regularly) it kicks you back out to the lobby - to restart the mission from the beginning, which can be up to an hour long - what a ridiculous design decision - completely ruined the co-op experience.
Summary: Un jeu ni mauvais,ni bon. De bon passages point de vue sénario,des graphismes moyens,dans l'enssemble je dirais que Conflict:denied ops est un jeu correct pour les nouveaux joueurs qui n'ont pas encore eu l'occasion de jouer à des jeux "new gen "donc qui ne feront pas la diference entre un trés bon est un trés moyen fps. Joueurs véterans s'abstenir!!