Summary: i thought i was buying a FPS but who knows what the developers were trying to create with this. it goes from sneaky/stealth to puzzle solving to platformer to FPS. to frustrate things even more, the subtitles are microscopic and the voice acting was done by out-of-work pornstars. you either need a theater-sized tv or plenty of patience if you even care as to what's going on with the story. and what a story it is (granted four chapters was all i could handle).
Summary: This game is by far the worst first person shooter I have ever played. The graphics are mediocre at best and the handling is horrific. Being able to shoot is like trying to shot an peanut with a spitball from 50 feet away. The storyline is all over the place and doesnt amount to anything else I have ever played. In all, this game wasnt worth what I paid for it.
Summary: I was eagerly waiting for "Call of Juarez" because it looked like it would be an updated, more freeform version of "Gun" from last year which I liked a lot, except that it was short, and much too linear, and thus, in my opinion not worth $60. Well this game is a tiny bit better as far as visuals, and a little more bloody (which I like; if you're playing a shooter, it's more realistic to have a HAVOC type engine with blood, ragdoll physics and so on, instead of the...
call of juarez WAS ISSN DAS? Schlimmer geht nimmer
16 October 2010
Summary: Call of Juarez??????? WAS BITTE IST DAS?????????? ich kenne Call of Duty, ich kenne alle ernstzunehmenden Teile ( 1, 2 (erweiterungspack) 3 und 5 ...) alle anderen beiden heißen "Modern Warfire (4 und 6) und bedienen nicht den vor sich hin ballernden Fan, sondern eher die Strategiegemeinde bzw. Leute, die sich dafür interessieren, moderne Kriegsführung gut unterhalten zu erleben. Auch wenn die Zielgruppen ungeheuer varriieren (2.