Reviews and Problems with Medal of Honor: Rising Sun
Showing 1-10 of 29
27 February 2012
Summary: After playing this for half an hour or so, I could see why I got it so cheap. Although the beginning Pearl Harbor sequence was OK, after that it was unrealistic, slow moving, slow action. The enemies are like robots that for the most part keep doing the same thing over and over. And the Gunny Sarge on top of the slow moving tank with a shotgun calling out orders...cheezy.
aged game that pales next to the call of duty series!
7 March 2008
Summary: i had this game when it first came out and thought it wasn't bad but not nearly as good as m.o.h. allied assault. years rolled by and i have all of the call of duty games for my 360. i saw this game for a good price and thought i'd check it out again. boy does his game stink! even for 2003. bland graphics and controls are terrible!
Summary: As a devotee of Allied Assault and Spearhead on the PC, I bought this in the blithe expectation that XBox processing power coupled with a 'Medal of Honour' rendering of Pacific carnage would make for a spiffing game. Unfortunately, the game palls by comparison with its forebears, and is a derisory effort compared with the likes of 'Halo 2'. When I tried to trade this in at a local 'Game Station', I was offered a couple of quid and some sympathy.
Summary: Medal of Honor rising sun is a FPS first person shooter and it is average. You are some army guy and you go round and kill japanese. You can gt on gun emplacements and stuff. The graphics are pretty average ok worse than avrage and the multiplayer is OK and way better than the single player. Put it this way you should buy halo or something else if you want a really good one but if you want cheap and below average this is the one.