www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Conflict-desert-storm-ii-back-to-baghdad.436827
5.1 out of 10

Conflict: Desert Storm II - Back to Baghdad

At the height of the 1991 Gulf War, 300 clicks into the heart of Read more

Great Deal: $5.40

Reviews and Problems with Conflict: Desert Storm II - Back to Baghdad

Showing 1-10 of 15
Overall 8
8.1
Gameplay 9
8.6
Graphics 6
6.3
Sound 9
8.8
Lifespan 9
8.9

Conflict Desert Storm II: Back to Baghdad Reader Review - 8.1

§ôµÏG®ïñD, IGN Entertainment
23 February 2004
  • Conclusion: Conflict Desert Storm II: Back to Baghdad is one of those games that while they may not be graphically appealing to most gamers, it definately has the gameplay that keeps you coming back for more every time. It has to be one of my favorite Xbox games that aren't extremely popular. Both Conflict Desert Storm games have been extremely fun, despite the fact that they're not playable on Xbox Live.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Target down, Target down

A reader, amazon.co.uk
6 July 2005
  • Summary: I thought this was very good, you can see the faces of the people as you squeeze off a few rounds, if you see them before they see you then you punish them, bad, if not just pour it on and fight your way out of it, it's just fun, you get a wide selection of weapons on each level, loads of ammo, you can switch between four different soldiers, you get stats back after each level what your accuracy was etc.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Nothing New....

amazon.co.uk
3 March 2005
  • Summary: It has no appeal to me, and does not live up to the standerds of the first game. Too similar with no cool new features, get Halo 2 instead.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Conflict desert storm 2 : Absolutely crap

amazon.co.uk
29 February 2004
  • Summary: this was certainly the worst first person shooter ever, with its pixel graphics and poor gameplay. I played the original and seems it was even better than the follow up hence my one star review. I believe the game can be much improved in every way. The only thing that interested me in the game was the XBOX live compatability, however the levels were poor and can be much improved.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Absolutely crap

amazon.co.uk
29 February 2004
  • Summary: this was certainly the worst first person shooter ever, with its pixel graphics and poor gameplay. I played the original and seems it was even better than the follow up hence my one star review. I believe the game can be much improved in every way. The only thing that interested me in the game was the XBOX live compatability, however the levels were poor and can be much improved.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

An average title

"kingollie", amazon.co.uk
6 February 2004
  • Summary: This game has no real improvements on the first title however it is still a decent squad shooter. The game though is short and I personally prefer the first title as it has a bigger variety of missions.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Reply to 'A gamer' with his "DO NOT BUY IT"

"kingollie", amazon.co.uk
6 December 2003
  • Summary: Ok, so it isn't as long or as fun as the first but have you played the first? I bought the first one about a month before the second gulf war and enjoyed it so much that i played it over and over again. Then, one month later it became quite huge due to the war in Iraq. I could not wait for the sequal, i am sorry to say i was partly dissapointed at the length of this game but was overall impressed.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Decent squad-shooter

"sir_keith", amazon.co.uk
30 October 2003
  • Summary: If you liked the original and games like KOTOR, Brute Force etc you will definately like this. The realistic setting appealed to me more than that of the games i just mentioned so it was ahead from the off. Kotor is an RPG which is where it falls down in my books as i'm not a big fan of the genre but it was certainly a good one, this has limited character development but you do get medals which is cool but you just get them in order as you progress (would have been...
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Just Hasn't Got What The Old One Had

"kingollie", amazon.co.uk
30 October 2003
  • Summary: I had bought the orginal for the PS2 and waited ages for the follow up I was sadly disappointed. The levels in the orginal game were simply outstanding and I kept going back and playing the game over and over again. The levels in CDS2 are more based around towns or complex and just don't offer that level of interest as the orginal does.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

rubbish!!

amazon.co.uk
11 October 2003
Next page >>