Excerpt: Apparently, gamers will never get tired of killing Nazis. The Call of Duty franchise proves this formula by standing out amongst the many WWII shooters released every year. How does Call of Duty 3 stack up against its predecessor? Check out Matt's review to find out.
Pros: ups: More of the same thing that made Call of Duty 2 great
Cons: downs: nothing new or especially exciting for the franchise
Conclusion: The next iteration of Activision’s Call of Duty series, Call of Duty 3 for the Xbox, wrings the last dregs of capability from the Xbox aging console and satisfyingly delivers on the promise of an upgraded Call of Duty 2.
Conclusion: THE VERDICT: First-person shooters need to be stunning to be highly recommended in a crowded market these days, and while Call of Duty 3 is stunning at first, it's unremarkable on the whole. Nonetheless, it's an impressive shooter and essential for all WWII game fans, including owners of COD2.
Summary: Halo 3 will be compared to this game. With some of the best visuals and sound effects to date, intense multiplayer action, and unique twist on a sometimes beaten-to-death genre, Call of Duty 3 blows away its predecessors and challenges the future wave of shooting games to step up. Ranks right up there with Perfect Dark Zero and Gears of War. A must-buy for any serious Xbox 360 owner.
Conclusion: Call of Duty 3 , c'est comme le 2, mais en mieux. Du coup, on ne peut pas trop le blâmer, parce que même s'il ressemble beaucoup (trop !) à son aîné, les campagnes sont toujours aussi prenantes et spectaculaires. Au passage, si vous hésitez à le prendre sur un autre support, optez pour la version Xbox 360 qui est de loin la plus convaincante.
Pros: Prenant, Spectaculaire, Animations
Cons: Trop facile, IA défaillante, Trop peu innovant