Reviews and Problems with Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30
Showing 1-3 of 3
pros and cons
5 April 2006
Summary: I recently bought the game on the good reviews and it seemed interesting. it is a brill game but reall easy i think the game play is smooth and it has a good story line but i dislike the fact you do not have medipacks. The graphics need to be brushed up a bit. I also think you should be able to skip the cutscenes it can be very annoying.
Pretty, but not enough creative tactical opportunity
Middle aged spread "when I was a boy", amazon.co.uk
14 September 2005
Summary: I was very excited about this game having read the above reviews and will try to be objective. Yes the game has some lovely features, the graphics are great and the mechanics are fine. However and it is a big however, it is extremly linear in character, you can only go along prescribed routes, which is fair enough in a stage by stage game as this is, however the limited climbing and jumping means you are forced to walk along routes that takes you into firing lines, when...
Summary: Brother`s in Arms is a good game, but not a great game, graphics, sound, and actual gameplay are all fine, but attacking one hedge row after another gets pretty repetitive, based on exact events during WW2 this game is, but there were many more interesting WW2 battles to base a game on, sending your men to flank the enemy is ok, but I spent more time telling the men to give me cover fire, while I attacked enemy positions myself, just more exciting, also, not a good idea...