www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Netgear-wnhdb3004.33474604
7.7 out of 10

Netgear WNHDB3004

Great Deal: $62.99

Reviews and Problems with Netgear WNHDB3004

Showing 1-10 of 13
Overall 8
8.0

My rating for the wireless networking kit.

Keith, Amazon
11 February 2014
  • Summary: It works as advertised before my TV didn't connect to my network, now it does. The speed of movement is much better than expected.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

It rattles like some piece is loose inside.

Sham Wadhwa, Amazon
24 April 2013
  • Summary: Item was received on time. One out of the two pieces of router bridge rattles, like some part is loose inside. I did not return it as I needed it right away. It works. I am afraid that rattling piece my go bad.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Did not work!

samRaj, Amazon
3 January 2013
  • Summary: the unit turned out to be defective after talking to Netgear tech support (not so easy experience). Returned the product. The return process was very easy.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Great device for HD streams

J. Martinez, Amazon
22 November 2010
  • Summary: Got mine and it's awesome. Streaming HD with no problem. Am getting 48 - 64 Mbps streaming in my house through two walls. This beats the moca coax device I was using and kills the powerline adapters I had tried.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Better products abound

M. Wang, Amazon
22 November 2010
  • Summary: This is an expensive product that simply fails to deliver on its promises. I get my phone and internet connections from the cable company. Since the phone switch board is in the basement, this is where the cable modem and consequently the router have to be placed as well. My basement being furnished with an office style ceiling with metal frames, the router's wifi signal has difficulty reaching all rooms on the second floor.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Works Well and Simple

R. Klingner, Amazon
22 November 2010
  • Summary: This product was easy to set-up. The only concern was the external access to the DVR thru Slingbox when outside the house. I needed to call Slingbox to help with the port-to-port transfer process. This Netgear product however worked well.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Not as striong a signal that I hoped for BUT

Mike McL, Amazon
22 November 2010
  • Summary: It works but I get the minimal connection from the far point in the house (upstairs from the modem) to downstairs. However, I am working off a DSL line and it covers the full length of the house. It drives a 70" HD TV for Netflix.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Plug and play!

farout, Amazon
22 November 2010
  • Summary: We purchased this for our new network AV receiver. I wanted something quick and easy that would not have a lot of drops. I had looked at the thought of running a cat 5 to the home theater, and using a powerline wireless unit. Most of those ratings were not as good as the bridge wireless units. Well I saw this unit. The ratings were high and the price was very reasonable. We ordered this unit and we are very pleased.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

faster than powerline adapters

Robert Loper, Amazon
22 November 2010
  • Summary: This kit (in dedicated bridge mode) is the first solution that allows me to stream a video file at 1080p resolution from my server to a HTPC box at my TV. Three generations of powerline adapters have not been able to do this. It was a plug and play setup, no real configuration needed since I was simply using them to bridge my network. Only con is that they are very expensive.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Weak signal, weak performance, just a poor product

D. Sowell, Amazon
22 November 2010
  • Summary: This was supposed to replace an older Netgear WAP. the device failed in all tests, throughput, range, signal quality, reliability. I own many Netgear products and am extremely happy with all of them but his device should not evern have the Netgear name stamped on it is just not what it's stated to be in any way or form. It gets a - poor rating.
  • Read full review
Next page >>