www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Linksys-wrt600n.33650292
7.5 out of 10

Linksys WRT600N

The Dual-Band Wireless-N Gigabit Router is really four devices i Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Linksys WRT600N

Showing 1-3 of 3
Overall 7
7.0

Linksys Dual-Band Wireless-N Gigabit Router with Storage Link WRT600N

PC Magazine
20 December 2008
  • Conclusion: Linksys makes the best of the bad "draft-n at 2.4 GHz" situation by having the only router here that can operate in the lower band and 5 GHz simultaneously. That means your n clients can run safely at 5 GHz while your b and g clients remain at 2.4 GHz. Add a full-featured Internet-sharing router and USB-based Storage Link and you've got a winner.
  • Pros: Solid performance. Full firewall and traffic management included. Simultaneous dual-band operation.
  • Cons: Advanced features are not so easy to use. Network hard drive performance with StorageLink USB is slow. Lacks print-server features.
  • Read full review

Linksys WRT600N Review: Dual-Band 11n comes to Linky-land

SmallNetBuilder
30 July 2008
  • Conclusion: Broadcom-based dual-band Wi-Fi Certified 802.11n Draft 2.0 router with 10/100/1000 WAN and LAN and NAS support
  • Pros: Two radios for simultaneous dual-band operation, Four-level priority-based QoS and WMM support, NAS features with external USB drive
  • Cons: No WPS, Relatively expensive
  • Read full review
Overall 9
9.0

Linksys WRT600N Dual-Band Wi-Fi Router

maximum pc
7 March 2008
  • Excerpt: The Linksys WRT600N is the first 802.11n draft 2.0 router we’ve tested that can operate on both the 2.4GHz and 5GHz frequency bands simultaneously. It’s also the most expensive Wi-Fi router we’ve ever tested. We tested the router at its default settings: The 5GHz radio operating in 802.11n-only mode and the 2.4GHz radio operating in mixed 802.11b/g/n mode. (Both radios have access to the same integrated four-port gigabit switch.
  • Pros: Dual-band blows all other routers we've tested out of the water; Storage Link give ad-hoc NAS functionality.
  • Cons: Expensive.
  • Read full review