Reviews and Problems with Seiko Men's SNK795K1S Stainless-Steel Analog
Showing 1-10 of 11
Amazon's picture is wrong...
M. Karwoski "mkultra", amazon.com
26 December 2010
Summary: The hands are slightly different than the picture that is shown. Simply look up the item number for the actual product. That being said, this watch is awesome, there's nothing I don't like! It's my first non digital watch. The luminous hands are nice but you need to charge them with a lot of light, and the luminous effect doesn't last more than 5 minutes. The back of watch is clear so you can see the movement, which is a nice touch.
Summary: I had this watch for 8 months and loved it. It is a very nice looking watch and kept good time for 8 months. Then one day for no apparent reason it stopped working. Now I can't get it to run over a few minutes at a time. I always thought that Seikos were good watches, but I am sorely disappointed in this one.
Summary: In my opinion, this is a very classy looking watch. I bought this back in 2007 and it has kept time at a very consistent rate. The only thing i didn't like about the watch was that the day i received it from the UPS guy, i had already somehow scratched the face of the watch. I would have preferred it if it was rated at at least 50M water-resistant and if the bezel was at least 40mm.
Summary: I bought this watch online one night after a second glass of Bordeaux. Part of the motivation was price;part was curiosity. What kind of watch do you get for (U.S.)$61.00? When I opened the box, I was shocked by the elegance of the watch's face: a relatively unreflective black, with two textures - an inner circle of satin-prismatic black, surrounded by an outer ring of flat black containing and contrasting beautifully with, the polished-metal hour markers.