www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Dyson DC22
8.0 out of 10

Dyson DC22

Dyson DC22 Motorhead is a canister vacuum powered by the Dyson d Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Dyson DC22

Showing 1-10 of 15
Overall 4
4.0

Highly disappointing

J. Baboval, Amazon
9 February 2011
  • Summary: There are several things wrong with this vacuum, and they overwhelm the good things. The first problem is the cord. Or the hose. Probably the cord. Some combination of the two isn't long enough. You have to unplug and move to get to the other side of the room. And my rooms aren't that big.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Absolutely no suction!

Melanie Zich, Amazon
25 December 2013
  • Summary: My daughter wanted a real working vacuum that was her size, which led me to this product. It says there is enough suction for small papers or debris but the one I got has absolutely none. It makes noise, but no suction. This left us all very disappointed.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Suck-tion

Jesse Nandra "Molecular Audio", Amazon
22 August 2013
  • Summary: Dyson. Never loses suction... Because it doesn't have any. Sarcasm aside (but I hope I made you chuckle), this isn't a very good hoover. My parents once owned a Dyson (which was some ancient model they bought secondhand) and they weren't impressed by its less than stellar suction performance.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Be wary of servicing sharks

N. E "Neil", Amazon
3 December 2012
  • Summary: As a cleaner this product is fine, I purchased this as a ligtweight option for my pensioner father in December 2011. However I was very annoyed to find out he has been cold called today (December 2012) by a company called excelservicing about taking out a maintenance contract at £60 a year!
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Great suction, but...

RGWilliams, Amazon
13 February 2012
  • Summary: This model has amazing suction, too much for some tasks. The suction is adjustable when the wand part is attached but not otherwise. With attachments fixed directly to the not very flexible pipe, you have only full suction.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Useless for allergy sufferers ...oh yes...and carpets!

S. M. Conway, Amazon
30 August 2011
  • Summary: Frankly anyone who actually suffers from a dust mite allergy should not buy a bagless vacuum cleaner - which excludes any Dyson machine as the bagless design is their calling card. Allergy sufferers definitely need bag vacuum cleaners in order to contain the dust on disposal.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

OVER DESIGNED AND UNDER PERFORMS

J. W. Comley "dwaynemagic", Amazon
25 June 2011
  • Summary: Like many people I like the idea of a Dyson. They are the iMac of the vacuum cleaner world and when you open the box you feel as though you have made the right purchase. Every component exudes design - the instruction manual, the way it's been packed and the product itself.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

try before you buy

lindenfair, Amazon
26 January 2011
  • Summary: I bought this model after the similar model Dyson I'd had for over 10 years, and which I loved, finally died. This one has good suction, and packs away small but it's a pig to empty, and for this reason alone I've given it such a low score.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

After a year I've changed my mind

Amazon Customer, Amazon
9 January 2010
  • Summary: I've been using this for a week now and am extremely impressed. We have a 3 bedroom town house and this is the ideal size cleaner for us. It is compact, powerful, and everything works together very well indeed.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Flimsy, not great at suction, poor for taller people

nicdigby "Nicola", Amazon
30 September 2008
  • Summary: Bought this and took it back after one day - the main problem is that I am 5'10" and I found that the hose wasn't long enough for me, even when fully extended. I was getting back ache in just a few minutes due to leaning over because of the short hose. My other half is 6'3" so had more of a problem.
  • Read full review
Next page >>