www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

LG 50PM9700
7.1 out of 10

LG 50PM9700

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with LG 50PM9700

Showing 1-5 of 5
Overall 4
4.0

Mediocre picture, clumsy & poor quality remote, and dog slow internet browser

Fleetsubmariner, Amazon
10 October 2012
  • Summary: Purchased this TV after a great deal of research, but obviously not enough. The picture is okay at best, nothing special, although I was pleased with the lack of glare (mine sits in the living room facing a huge bay window - no noteworthy problems).
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

one year dud

I. Soliman, Amazon
9 October 2012
  • Summary: Picture very average and is dead exactly one year later with low usage. Panasonic is far superior. Disappointing and waste of money.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Not good in bright room and average picture quality.

y2g, Amazon
9 October 2012
  • Summary: I specially bought this tv for TruBlack filter for my bright room. But I was surprise to see the screen in my bright sunny room at day. It's like mirror. Screen is too reflective and not watchable at day time. Also picture is not bright enough to watch spots and movies.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Poor SMART features

Jon Hoover, Amazon
9 October 2012
  • Summary: SMART features were very unreliable and/or slow. Picture quality was also lacking compared to Samsung. Would not recommend at this point.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Poor Quality...

Anonymous, Newegg
26 May 2012
  • Summary: I went through all of the manuals, picture wizard, setups for both TV settings and cable DVR settings, and still get ugly picture quality on my basic cable. I'm using the HDMI cable connection with the correct input selection.
  • Pros: -Massive Size! -Lots of Extras -Intuitive & Attractive Menus
  • Cons: -Picture quality is very poor on basic cable channels. -Picture only looks good on HD channels. My old CRT from the 90's has better picture quality with my basic cable channels. -Picture Wizard is Misleading; Channels don't appear as high quality as the test screens do. -Pixels appear very large ...
  • Read full review