www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Dummy.190587
6.6 out of 10

Coby Kyros MID7015

Coby Kyros MID7015 The Kyros™ MID7015 is a tablet PC that p Read more

Great Deal: $184.29

Reviews and Problems with Coby Kyros MID7015

Showing 1-3 of 3
Overall 10
10
Value for money 7
7.0
Features 8
8.0
Performance 10
10
Battery performance 8
8.0

Coby Kyros MID7015

intomobile.com
30 May 2013
  • Excerpt: Coby's Kyros MID7015 is a slimmer successor of the MID7005 model, boasting the same 7-inch WVGA resistive touchscreen, Wi-Fi connectivity, Android 2.1 OS, web browser, SD card slot and Aldiko E-Book reader app.
  • Pros: Verizon 4G LTE network is incredibly fast, 32GB microSD card included, Integrated kickstand works in portrait and landscape
  • Cons: Battery life is among the worst we�ve ever seen, No 4G LTE power toggle option, Kickstand in landscape orientation blocks microUSB port
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Coby Kyros MID7015 Internet Touchscreen Tablet

PC Magazine
2 February 2011
  • Conclusion: The $200 Coby Kyros MID7015 Internet Touchscreen Tablet uses a limited version of Android, and lacks the grace and abilities of more advanced (and expensive) tablets.
  • Pros: Affordable. Better-than-average graphics for Android 2.1. Supports 1080p playback via HDMI output. Comes with case and earbuds.
  • Cons: AppsLib, the Archos-designed apps portal, is the only market available. Touch screen is resistive and not terribly sensitive. File sync is a tedious process.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Tablet Coby Kyros MID7015 é barato, mas pode sair caro

techtudo.com.br
19 April 2011
  • Conclusion: O tablet Coby Kyros MID7015 poderia ser um bom dispositivo para reprodução de conteúdos multimídia, uma vez que ele reproduz vídeos a 1080p sem maiores problemas. Porém, é sinônimo de insatisfação certa para usuários mais exigentes, ou que já tiveram algum tipo de experiência com tablets mais avançados.
  • Pros: Preço competitivo., Sistema operacional aberto., Roda vídeos em 1080p.
  • Cons: Tela resistiva., Baixo desempenho., Ausência de Android Market.
  • Read full review Translate to English