Reviews and Problems with Hankook K425 Kinergy eco
Showing 1-10 of 99
Dry handling 9
Wet handling 7
21 September 2013
Summary: I just have these tyres for 6000km's, good grip on dry road, in wet a little bit less. Tyres are quiet. Wear is a little bit less, I mostly drive on highways and on the corners I can already se wearing off. For 10 EUR more you have premium brand (in 195/65), it's better to buy one of these premiums.
Summary: Pleased with these tyres - well, they worked for me! No problems with grip etc. I bought these because they offered what I look for in a tyre - they are marketed as 'eco' (the clue is in the name) and I suggest that others consider this when buying. I got good MPG with the Hankooks AND the full set lasted for 50K miles (moved around the car every 10K or so). PLUS, they are substantially cheaper than the Michelin Energy (top rated eco tyre).
Summary: These are fitted to my Mitsubishi Lancer 1.6 on the front wheels , I drive a 50/50 mix of motorway and B roads generally, with a varied driving style - steady to get to work and pushing on to get back Home! They were a good price Â£52 each fitted for a quality brand and given they were some of the most modern and fuel efficient tyres on the market I had high hopes. Braking , handling and acceleration or all good in the dry , with a slight weakness in the wet.