www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Microtek-scanmakertm-i800.214721
5.7 out of 10

Microtek ScanMaker i800

The ScanMaker i800 flatbed scanner comes fully loaded with the P Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Microtek ScanMaker i800

Showing 1-10 of 32
Overall 8
8.0

Good Scans But Slow

KCCF46, Amazon
6 February 2014
  • Summary: I have a huge collection of transparencies and negatives that are in all formats; 35mm to 8x10 as well as prints. The ScanMaker i800 does a very good job handling most of the sizes. For 35mm I would use a separate scanner just for that size. The i800 is unusually slow although the new Microtek Scan Potter software improves the speed somewhat. The quality of the scans is very good and with some tweaking in Photoshop can produce more than acceptable files for publication.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Beautiful quality

Sherry, Amazon
29 October 2013
  • Summary: This was purchased for a dental office to copy film X-rays. Quality is amazing, price was amazing, too. Highly recommend it.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Microtek Scanmaker i800

Texas Boy, Amazon
9 July 2012
  • Summary: I have owned this scanner for 5 years. Started off with WinXP. When upgrading to Win7 x64, it wouldn't work. Contacted tech support who said it could not run with Win7 x64. Made it work with Win7 x64 by manually inputting the registry entries. Has worked flawlessly for the last 3 years. The glass does appear to have some inside smudges, but since I scan mostly documents it hasn't been noticeable.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Horrible tech support and software

J. Kline, Amazon
20 January 2012
  • Summary: I have had the i800 for three years and on many occassions it has stopped working and caused all my USB ports to freeze. I have installed it on a Dell, a compaq, an Asus, an MSI, and an EVGA motherboard. If I have the scanner plugged in then none of my USB ports work. If I uninstall the scanner software then they all magicaly come back to life. Contacted tech support in 2009, 2010 and 2012. Most recently they continue to say this is the first they have ever heard of it.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Win 7 x64

jdp812, Amazon
11 March 2011
  • Summary: I've owned this scanner for 3-4 years. The calibrating on startup is annoying, but I've learned to live with it. Had trouble installing it on a Win 7 x64 system, but finally got it working and since then it has worked flawlessly. The workaround was to manually export the original Registry settings to the Win 7 Registry. Maybe I'm the only one that had a problem installing. Scanner is slow compared to newer models, but the scan features are great.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Expensive Piece of Junk

MiseryDisdain, Amazon
24 May 2010
  • Summary: This is one of the most disappointing pieces of junk I've bought in a while. We bought this scanner for its negative/slide/photo scanning capabilities. It did all of those things well until the warranty ran out. Then without warning it just stopped functioning. I can turn it on and it sits and makes a high-pitched squealing noise and that's about it. It did great quality scans, but for the price I'd expect a bit more life out of it.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Microtek ScanMaker i800 = 1 worthless machine!!!

Steve L. Huff, Amazon
22 February 2010
  • Summary: For the past 8 years I used (pretty much daily) and LOVED my ScanMaker 3800. So my expectations were high. Boy was I ever disappointed? The drivers refuse to stay operable, so I have had to uninstall and reinstall them over a dozen times? Both the COPY and DIGITAL ICE quick buttons on front refuse to work? After spending 2 hours (the privilege I had to pay $12 for!!) with tech support they tell me it won't work because of my 3-in-1 HP printer?
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Flatbed Scanner

William E. Olson, Amazon
30 January 2010
  • Summary: I purchased the Microtek ScanMaker i800 flatbed scanner over a year ago and am well pleased with it. The main reason for purchase was that this scanner would scan negative and positive films up to 8 by 12 in in size, which it does very well. It does have a fairly high learning curve due of all the features/settings available for each scan. The only minor negative item is the fact that it is quite slow, as it has to calibrate itself for each scan.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Does things other scanners won't

M. Brown, Amazon
16 December 2009
  • Summary: I work for a museum that has a number of different negative formats in the collection. It is very hard to find transparency scanners that are able to scan sizes other than 35mm, let alone any size. I have been using this scanner for 3 years and have found it to do a great job with only a few temperamental moments. It is true that if users are planning to produce large files with the scanner, the better the computer the faster the scanner works.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

-1 star

Dale Minshew "light gatherer", Amazon
19 October 2009
  • Summary: The absolute worst online purchase I have ever made. The software included was not the software advertised or included with the manual, and after a month of contacting their support team (e-mail only, no phone number to talk to a real person) I returned the product. I was unable to make the first scan with their software. Needless to say I wasted many man hours and will never purchase another Microtek product in the future.
  • Read full review
Next page >>