www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Fujitsu ScanSnap S500M
6.7 out of 10

Fujitsu ScanSnap S500M

The ScanSnap S500 Color Document Scanner is a true one-touch Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Fujitsu ScanSnap S500M

Showing 1-5 of 5
Overall 2
2.0

not a good scanner

Chris, pcRUSH.com
31 May 2008
  • Summary: Comments about Fujitsu ScanSnap S500M: This scanner is not very good. Like all sheet-fed scanners, it is low quality, slow, and horribly inconvienent.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Fujitsu should not make scanners!

Chris, pcRUSH.com
27 May 2008
  • Summary: Comments about Fujitsu ScanSnap S500: Fujitsu should just simply stop making scanners. They are not good at all. They have a horrible design, they are ugly to look at, they are flimsy, and slow. This scanner is no exception. I would not recommend this to ANYBODY.
  • Cons: Inaccurate Color, Poor Bit Depth, Poor Resolution, Poor Software, Slow
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Very disappointed

BruceK, Amazon
29 June 2007
  • Summary: I have been scanning lots of documents by hand on a flatbed Epson scanner and feeding them to Adobe Acrobat 8.0. The docs come out stunning looking and with fantastic OCR accuracy.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Not sure why my two work so differently from everyone else's

Amazon Customer, Amazon
11 February 2007
  • Summary: I've got two of these scanners--one at home, one at my office. I've increasingly found myself looking for a sledgehammer when trying to use them. Both of them grab clumps of paper, so that I find myself having to feed documents by holding on to all the pages but one, releasing the rest one at a...
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

ScanSnap

Ellen H., Newegg
11 November 2006
  • Summary: Toy
  • Pros: Cheap
  • Cons: Document Feeder is delicate. After using an old MultiFunction unit with paper port (old), I expected a faster performance. I'm very disappointed with the unit after reading all the reviews and will probably try to return it. It was substantially more difficult to use and slower than my ancient Mu...
  • Read full review