www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Canon CanoScan 9000F
7.9 out of 10

Canon CanoScan 9000F

Enjoy high-speed scanning for everything from photos to Read more

Great Deal: $221.22

Reviews and Problems with Canon CanoScan 9000F

Showing 1-10 of 22
Overall 4
4.0

This scanner works fine for not-so-important memories

William F. Lawson, Amazon
8 March 2016
  • Summary: I bought this scanner because it was the cheapest scanner that scans larger negatives. I guess I got what I paid for. Pro: Scans fast enough. Scans batches of negatives. Con: Camera equipment from the 40s, 50s, & 60s, did not have auto exposure because it wasn't available yet.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Despite hours worth of trying to download work-arounds such as MP Navigator and such -- which I managed to use on a previous lap

JMH, Amazon
18 January 2016
  • Summary: I am not reviewing this CanonScan9000F, but I am commenting here because this seems to be one of Canon's newest model scanners. However, I will not buy this particular scanner. I currently own a Canon8800F scanner, which I have had for about 5 years and it works very well.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

A Step Back in Quality

RBP, Amazon
24 August 2012
  • Summary: My intent was to use this scanner to replace a defunct Canon Model 8600F scanner which I had used to scan many thousands of slides and photos. Upon receiving the new scanner I scanned approximately 100 slides which seemed to be not as sharp and slides scanned with the previous scanner.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

SERIOUSLY DISAPPOINTED WITH CANON

Phillip H. Darling, Amazon
23 August 2012
  • Summary: No software CD or any documentation was included with the scanner. The box and packaging did NOT look like it had previously been opened. Had to find and then download the software. Worked fine after I did that. SERIOUSLY DISAPPOINTED in the scan quality of scanned slides.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Driver appears incompatible with Apple OS X 10.9

W Emanuel, Amazon
23 August 2012
  • Summary: I do not write many reviews, finding that most who precede me have done a fantastic job already. But I was caught completely off-guard in the purchase of the Canon 9000F MKII scanner. First, I am very pleased with this scanner as a piece of hardware.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Poor quality scan

Y. Leventhal, Amazon
23 August 2012
  • Summary: Currently I have 4 working scanners in my possession, including this Canon scanner, my latest purchase. As I am doing a large project with old family photos, I want a high quality scanner.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

CanoScan 9000F

LM, Amazon
23 August 2012
  • Summary: I have thousands of color slides, mostly the Sierra's, that have blue skies, granite, and lakes. The blue in the sky and lakes is not a correct blue. The corrections I made to the scanned product in Advanced Mode was only partially successful.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Although the quality of the scans were nice, I had issues scanning in slides which was ...

Michael A. De Rocha, Amazon
23 August 2012
  • Summary: Although the quality of the scans were nice, I had issues scanning in slides which was the main purpous of the purchace. Would get artifacts, and looks like a prisium effect. These issues were on 2 of the 4 slide areas. I had to return it.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

I returned it

sd260, Amazon
23 August 2012
  • Summary: I bought this scanner to scan old negatives and it seemed like a good choice based on the reviews. I was very disappointed. I, who am very technical, found the software non-intuitive and difficult to use.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

SO MUCH TO LIKE, SO MUCH TO HATE, SO LITTLE TIME

handyman315, Amazon
23 August 2012
  • Summary: As a senior geek, my scanner experience goes back to futzing with the early Microteks. In 20 or so years, not much has changed in the futzing department; while the quality of scanned images is impressive.
  • Read full review
Next page >>