www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Canon CanoScan 4400F
6.3 out of 10

Canon CanoScan 4400F

The CanoScan 4400F is a mid range scanner that permits you to s Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Canon CanoScan 4400F

Showing 1-9 of 9
Overall 2
2.0

bad equipment

bezerk1, Ebay
1 February 2013
  • Summary: Very very very old style would not work with my windows eight and 64 bit computer. Complete waste of money.
  • Read Full Review
Overall 2
2.0

Don't get this

Beaux "maxyshear", Amazon
17 January 2011
  • Summary: I bought this scanner, barely used it, let it sit for a few months, and now it straight up wont work. It's landfill, Don't buy it.
  • Read Full Review
Overall 2
2.0

CanoScan 4400F Does Not Work

A. Davidson "APD", Amazon
13 March 2009
  • Summary: I had high hopes for this scanner but after 1 1/2 months it is getting returned. It worked fine at first but then I began to get error messages when I'd try to scan...
  • Read Full Review
Overall 2
2.0

Displeased with Canon

Nelson D. Stephens "Scanned out", Amazon
4 March 2009
  • Summary: I ordered this product to scan old photographic slides. Our computer utilized the Windows Vista operating system.
  • Read Full Review
Overall 2
2.0

Quickly obsolete

Cool Whip, Amazon
9 February 2009
  • Summary: I did like this scanner for the price. But Canon has this bad habit of not creating new drivers as Operating Systems change.
  • Read Full Review
Overall 2
2.0

Great, when it works

Vancouver USA "mmxwa", Amazon
17 December 2007
  • Summary: I replaced another failed Canon scanner with this 4400F. I used it 6 months. It worked sometimes, and the quality of output was great when it worked.
  • Read Full Review
Overall 2
2.0

Vista and CanoScan 4400F Scanner

Barbara Cundiff, Amazon
9 August 2007
  • Summary: I could not get this scanner to work with Vista. Their tech support was very good but it just would not work.
  • Read Full Review
Overall 2
2.0

Okay scanner, terrible software (for Mac), some minor Leopard bugs

James Huff, Amazon
7 June 2007
  • Summary: This scanner is okay as far as the quality of images goes; nothing fabulous, but not bad for the price, either.
  • Read Full Review
Overall 2
2.0

Who designed this thing?

Gil, B&H Photo
20 April 2007
  • Summary: I purchased this scanner to digitize some of my 35mm negatives and it turned out to be a very poor choice. Here's a list of the top 4 problems I've discovered so far:1.
  • Read Full Review