Summary: This router is very small and very light. It is about the size of a post card. The only reason i didn't give it 5 eggs is because the cords will sometimes pull the router off the table because it is so light. It weighs about as much as a cheap 10 key calculator.
Summary: I'm comparing this to the Edimax EW-7416APn because they offer very similar features, and I've owned both. If you're OK with just any of the 3 options on the front of the box, this should work fine. Otherwise, if you require advanced tweaking to the setup, you may want to consider the EW-7416APn.
Pros: In comparison to, say, the Edimax EW-7416APn, this has more Ethernet ports than 1, and higher-gain antennae to boot.
Cons: But unfortunately, in comparison to the EW-7416APn again, the options within the router are a bit slim when I peeked inside.
not upto my expectations. the range is same as ...
ajinkya pathak, amazon.in
27 February 2015
Summary: not upto my expectations. the range is same as that of tplink dual antenna generic routers. the 9dbi antennae are a sham!!!!!!!!!! checked thoroughly by me. Also reduces speed to half , if used in repeater mode.
Summary: its at the end of a cable from my main BT router - did work straight away, easy to set up, but then some computers picked it up and some couldn't - as I am not a techie it might be my failing, but I so wish this was straight forward!
Summary: I am a BT infinity customer who has been having problems with the HomeHub3 (HH3) wireless router. Had tried to get BT to sort it out, but they couldn't help. For the sake of £20 I decided to go for the Edimax router to see if this could provide a decent wifi.
Summary: the only bad thing I can say about it is the antennas are fixed and can't be replaced with better ones but the functions of the software for the price are great, can easily be set up as a wifi repeater or other things for a fraction of the price of a dedicated device even from the same manufacturer.
Excerpt: Вполне нормальная бюджетная модель созданная не для красоты, а для работы. Покрытие стандартное - не больше не меньше(10 метров от дома). Устойчиво заработал на прошивке 1.22. После этого забыл,где поставил.
Pros: По характеристикам, за эти деньги, наверное самая лучшая. Устойчивая работа. Хорошее покрытие.
Cons: Не рабочая базовая прошивка. Нужно сразу перешивать....
Conclusion: Скажите, у кого работает без сбоев, какая прошивка у вас стоит. У меня на заводской 1.14. не работал вообще. Откатил на 1.09. - летает, но есть иногда глюки. Приходится перегружать время от времени. Какая свежая прошивка работает стабильно???? А-то не очень хочется єксперементировать и терять время.