www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Xerox-colorqube-8570.32731285
7.8 out of 10

Xerox ColorQube 8570

Xerox ColorQube 8570 The Xerox ColorQube 8570 is a printer Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Xerox ColorQube 8570

Showing 1-10 of 17
Overall 4
4.0

Slow warm up and durability issues

Wayne.457, Xerox
31 October 2014
  • Summary: We have purchased around 20 of these for certain clients and the longest one has lasted is about 3 years. We have had quite a few complaints about them being quite noisy and slow first page print outs. Most of the printers last around 18 months. Not durable what so ever. Have switched to a competitor.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

designed to fail

Bob, Xerox
7 May 2014
  • Summary: The color cube 8570 is well designed and engineered; however, the design intent is of no benefit to the consumer; It is designed to make money for Xerox in the sale of the color cubes.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Disappointed

Kansaspatty, Xerox
18 April 2014
  • Summary: My designs looked good on the screen, but when not when printed. I tried downloading different drivers. No change. I tried looking at the print settings, letting the printer be in charge of printing, and letting the software dictate the printing setup. Nothing changed. Once in a while I get what I want.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

poor

sentinel456, Xerox
30 August 2013
  • Summary: I own one for almost a year. It was repaired 4 time the Xerox decided to replace it with a refurbished printer after 4 months. The replacement has been repaired twice so far in about an additional 5 months.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Ok for average printing, but NOT good for quality stuff

Anonymous, Xerox
23 August 2013
  • Summary: We have been very disappointed in this printer. I am like another reviewer: The gray shades are just not there! And don't tell me I don't have pictures with gray shades, I am a professional. I DO!
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

junk

Anonymous, Xerox
10 July 2013
  • Summary: upgraded from 8560 big mistake ink rubs off and disconnects from network all the time as I said junk
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

A Downgrade from previous model - Noisy, broken-sounding paper feeding

bj3, Xerox
16 May 2013
  • Summary: I previously owned an Phaser 8400 and then owned a Phaser 8560. Unfortunately the ColorQube 8570 is not up to par. It is a significantly worse product compared to the older Phaser 8560. Besides the more expensive ink, there seems to be a major defect with the page feed roller system on this new design. After about 700 copies my machine developed a loud grinding sound every time it made a print. As a prior owner of this product line, I knew this was not quite right.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

8570 Big Disappointment - No more Xerox

KSA, Xerox
8 May 2012
  • Summary: As a Phaser loyalist for 8 years (and 6 prior models) Iu2019m now done with Xerox. Quality has continually devolved.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Not Good For Cardstock or Specialty Printing

Anonymous, Xerox
21 March 2012
  • Summary: I thought that going the solid ink route would be great. The ink size saves on space and is more eco-friendly. The printer is good if you are doing basic printing on traditional plain paper. It does print well on non-gloss cardstock. However, if you plan to print a lot of photographs, especially on gloss paper I would not recommend. You can see the color dots that make up the image. It does not look photo quality.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Wastefull Ink Is Way Too Expensive!

tvpRich, Xerox
31 October 2011
  • Summary: Don't be fooled by the inexpensive initial price of this printer. They'll get you over and over on the Dry Ink later. With a Price Tag of $600 to replace the Ink (all colors), this printer might make sense if it used the Ink in small amounts. But instead, It slowly looses all the ink to the "Waste" tray. I've used my printer only a couple times per month, but cannot turn it off, (Instructions recommendation) which end up wasting my electricity and printer electronics.
  • Read full review
Next page >>