www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

HP Photosmart A636
7.2 out of 10

HP Photosmart A636

The Hewlett Packard Photosmart A636 Compact Photo InkJet Printer Read more

Great Deal: $318.00

Reviews and Problems with HP Photosmart A636

Showing 1-6 of 6
Overall 6
6.0

HP Photoprinter

Steve "Steve", Amazon
28 June 2014
  • Summary: Sometimes doesn't handle the paper very well. Requires some fiddling to get it to work. A disposable unit.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

stuff are missing

SVT, Amazon
19 January 2014
  • Summary: My printer arrived without installation disk in a box,which has to be included,who took it ?Downloaded installation from HP website,can not make printer work with my Mac .Other then I cant use my computer to print pictures,pictures from the camera have good quality.Also non of the stores have 110...
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Great little printer but

D-Squared, Amazon
19 December 2010
  • Summary: This is a nice little photo printer. I bought it to take with me when we visit relatives during Christmas. I've had it for more than a year now and it still works just fine. You can print out a few photos right on the spot and give to family.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Nice little portable printer

wa0fgw, Ebay
8 November 2010
Overall 6
6.0

Not for your everyday photo printing

Amazon Customer "California Dreamin'", Amazon
26 December 2008
  • Summary: This is a great printer with lots of fun features, but the ink is far to expensive to use for your everyday printing needs. I estimate that the prints cost me about $1.20 per print. I can take my SD card to the corner drug store and have them printed for less than half that amount.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

This kitty loves the printer, but the ink belongs in the litter box

Carol Hester "kitty 47", Amazon
4 December 2008
  • Summary: I bought this printer to replace an old HP, a display model bought off the floor at Office Depot 4?? years ago. The old printer and cartridges easily printed 100+ pix with no loss of quality--but, it finally died.
  • Read full review