www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Canon PIXMA Pro9500 Mark II
7.3 out of 10

Canon PIXMA Pro9500 Mark II

Professional Printing Performance for Large Archival Photos. It Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Canon PIXMA Pro9500 Mark II

Showing 1-10 of 12
Overall 2
2.0
Value for money 6
6.0
Features 6
6.0
Performance 6
6.0
Overall quality 6
6.0

Not for the professional

Mat, Canon
30 July 2013
  • Conclusion: If you started in photography with a dark room, like i did, a print size of 11x14 is standard. There is no support for this in the paper profile. This is not acceptable. I will get rid of this printer as soon as i can. I have been a fan of Canon for about 20 years but no longer.
  • Cons: Difficult to use, Difficult Setup, no support for 11x14 paper, canon does not sell 11x14 paper, front paper feed is a joke
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0
Value for money 2
2.0
Features 4
4.0
Performance 2
2.0
Overall quality 2
2.0

DO NOT BUY THIS PRINTER!!!

JayhawkMAH, Canon
27 June 2012
  • Conclusion: I purchased this printer at the end of March 2010. It printed perfectly for the first 7 months. With the exception of going through large amounts of ink, it printed high quality images. I was going through a set of ink cartridges about every 12-15 4"x6" and 5"x7" photos on Platinum Pro paper.
  • Pros: Easy Setup, High Quality Output, easy to use
  • Cons: Slow Print Speed, unreliable, huge ink usage (or wasted), stopped printing yellow & magenta, expensive to own, expensive to operate
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0
Value for money 2
2.0
Features 4
4.0
Performance 2
2.0
Overall quality 2
2.0

DO NOT BUY THIS PRINTER!!!

JayhawkMAH, Canon
27 June 2012
  • Conclusion: I purchased this printer at the end of March 2010. It printed perfectly for the first 7 months. With the exception of going through large amounts of ink, it printed high quality images. I was going through a set of ink cartridges about every 12-15 4"x6" and 5"x7" photos on Platinum Pro paper.
  • Pros: Easy Setup, High Quality Output, easy to use
  • Cons: Slow Print Speed, unreliable, huge ink usage (or wasted), stopped printing yellow & magenta, expensive to own, expensive to operate
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0
Value for money 2
2.0
Features 6
6.0
Performance 2
2.0
Overall quality 2
2.0

Washed up

GERRITL, Canon
31 August 2010
  • Conclusion: I have an old Canon i9900 that prints beautiful, vivid color 13 by 19 inch enlargements and am very happy with it still today. I purchased the Pro9500 to reach the next level of quality art prints.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0
Value for money 2
2.0
Features 6
6.0
Performance 6
6.0
Overall quality 6
6.0

NOT for papers other than rag and canvas

shutterbug1, Canon
11 August 2010
  • Conclusion: This printer is only for graphic artists. The brochures fail to tell you this. The Pigment inks provide a watercolor, washed out look. For vivid, color rich photos using anything but canvas and rag matte paper, you will be disappointed at the washed out results.
  • Cons: not for printing non-professional images, horrible image results using glossy papers, washed out images on non-rag paper
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0
Value for money 6
6.0
Features 2
2.0
Performance 2
2.0
Overall quality 2
2.0

Don't Buy It

Disappointed, Canon
2 May 2010
  • Conclusion: I have been using the Pixma 9000 for three years and have printed well over 2000 prints of all kinds with beautiful results; this includes B&W, Color, Semi Gloss and Glossy. While there is nothing wrong with my Pixma 9000, it is three years old and I thought it was time for a new printer.
  • Pros: Easy Setup, durable
  • Cons: Low Productivity, High Running Cost, Large Footprint, Low Quality Output, Poor Media Handling, unreliable, incapable of printing highlights well., print reflects light strangely., takes longer to print than the 9000, shakes the table more than the 9000, prints do not look like real photos, prints...
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Das letzte...

Kay Blunck "ktbtechnik", Amazon
25 December 2013
  • Summary: Habe mich für diesen Drucker entschieden. Glaubte das Canon auch gute Drucker bauen kann. Mit dem 9500 MK II ist es ja auch nicht der preiswerteste Drucker auf dem Markt. Die Qualtät ist soweit OK. Aber der Tintenverbrauch und Kosten sind schon nervend teuer.
  • Read full review Translate to English
Overall 2
2.0

Tintensäufer - nie wieder so eine Canon-Kiste!

M. Stock, Amazon
14 May 2013
  • Summary: Der Drucker ist eine finanzielle Katastrophe! Druckqualität ist 1A, ABER: Es müssen immer mind 5-10 Seiten gedruckt werden, sonst lohnt sich das Ganze nicht. Beim Einschalten führt er diesen unsäglichen Selbsttest / Selbstreinigung durch.
  • Read full review Translate to English
Overall 2
2.0

langsam, Patronen schwer zu bekommen, teuer

Dr. Robert Aberham, Amazon
4 October 2012
  • Summary: Der Drucker ist im Vergleich zum vorgängermodell (DIN A3 Drucker von Canon) fruchtbar langsam, die Druckaufträge dauern ewig, wenn man die Qualität schwächer stellt, also auf Schnelldruckmodus verblaßen die Farben völlig, die Druckerpatronen sind teuer und der komplette Satz ist sehr schwer zu...
  • Read full review Translate to English
Overall 2
2.0

Canon PIXMA Pro 9500 Mark II A3 Farb-Tintenstrahldrucker

Mamu, Amazon
1 July 2011
  • Summary: Bin seit einem halben Jahr Besitzer dieses Druckers. Tinte "verputzt" er wirklich überreichlich!!! (Die Bilder sind aber Klasse). Wer mit diesen A3-Drucker nur gelegentlich druckt, sollte dies mit den sehr hohen Tintenverbrauch eher über einen anderes Modell nachdenken.
  • Read full review Translate to English
Next page >>