www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Canon-pixma-ip3300.32733641
7.0 out of 10

Canon PIXMA iP3300

If you're looking for a photo printer with performance, style an Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Canon PIXMA iP3300

Showing 1-4 of 4
Overall 8
8.0

Canon Pixma iP3300 review

expertreviews.co.uk
21 June 2007
  • Excerpt: Canon's Pixma iP3300 is the cheapest printer on test at just £46, but that certainly doesn't mean it's the weakest. The quality of its output is worthy of a much higher price tag, with flawless text printing thanks to the pigment-based black ink. There's no visible spidering, and the thick nature of the black characters gives text a solid look that we like a lot.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Canon PIXMA iP3300 review

expertreviews.co.uk
20 October 2006
  • Excerpt: Canon's PIXMA iP3300 costs only £3 more than Epson's Stylus D78, but it's in a different league. It's less basic than the four printers that cost less, but at £46 it's still easily affordable. The iP3300 prints with four colours, which, like those of the D78, come in separate ink tanks. Before you insert them, you need to slot the print heads into place. This is a simple, once-only job.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10
Features 10
10
Ease of use 10
10
Performance 8
8.0

Canon Pixma iP3300

GadgetSpeak
18 October 2006
  • Summary: Another printer looking like a rectangular box, however providing the other half does not mind the grey colour then surely it’s all about the print quality and print speed.
  • Read full review

Canon PIXMA iP3300

iXBT.com
19 October 2006
  • Summary: Перед нами довольно симпатичное и экономичное устройство, с высоким качеством и скоростью печати. Довольно тихое, очень простое и удобное в эксплуатации. Но, выбирая принтер, зададим себе вопрос: чем отличается iP3300 от своих бюджетных собратьев (например, iP2200 или iP1700)? Отличия, конечно, есть, и не заметить их невозможно. Скоростью печати — но очень незначительно; дизайном — это дело вкуса; наличием приемного и второго подающего лотков — это не принципиально.
  • Read full review Translate to English