Summary: Nice product. Canon should be made more bjc-55 or similar. Very portable, good print quality, medium velocity, easy to carry, Cartridge can be refilled in home. Drivers for all operating sistems easy to find.
Summary: People complain this printer costs the same as a laser printer... it might be true 10 years ago. This is a very neat and easy to carry printer. It allows you to print important documents without paying expensive business center fee at your hotel. It even runs on battery so can be used anywhere including airplane. Obviously, it is not designed for large volume printing. However, it is a good tool for your business trip or convention presentation preparation.
Summary: I bought this printer just because I needed something that I can carry away. However I am not realy satisfied with the quality and the speed. If you want to print more than 20 pages, it can be a burden. With the money you pay, you can even buy a Canon laser printer.
Summary: There's no more printers so small like this one. Other printers are at least twice bigger, don't fit the loptop case, and do not remind the portable printers at all. It is so sad that big companies like Canon or HP don't make small printers like the Canon BJC 55 any more. Are we getting forward or rather backward?...
Still more expensive than the current printers 4 years later
3 March 2006
Summary: I watched this printer for years and I was waiting for the price to drop. I finally caved in a bought a refurb 1 year ago. Pro: Lightweight 2Lbs(with battery), USB, battery powered, comes with AC adapter, size is small to fit in a back pack. Works with my Tablet PC software. Con: High quality mode is slow compared to today's printers as well as resolution. Old type of feeding one page at a time. Could not get the IR to work.
Summary: I've had the predecessor (BJC-50) for about 4 years. It has been used heavily at home and one the road, and it has taken hard beatings. It has finally given out, and I'm going to buy another. It's a truly amazing product. I can't think of another computer peripheral that still costs the same as it did 4 years ago -- and is still worth the high price. Why can't anyone else match it at a lower price? Darned if I know!