Reviews and Problems with Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six 3
Showing 1-3 of 3
Just plain bad!!
GC "GRC", Amazon
13 July 2004
Summary: This game was simply frustrating at every turn. I never really got into the tom clancy games a lot and tried this as a first in many yrs on my ps2. The levels were just plain annoying, the level of difficulty as I remember was adjustable, and the enemy AI was generally quite good, the problem lies with your team mates, who will sometimes do the dumbest things ever.
Summary: After shooting big guns, sneaking around, snipping bad guys and blowing up bad guy vehicles I was ready for another Clancy base shoot'em up game. This is unworthy to have the Clancy name on it. This is completely different from the other games. And why is it even rated M? There is hardly any blood or gore? The biggest gripe i have with this game is the weapon's control, you get to use handguns, submachine guns, assault rifles, heavy machine guns, and sniper rifles.
Summary: Rainbow Six 3 for the PS2 is quite a good looking game and plays generally quite well, with a decent interface and controls. But I feel it has a significant problem. Let me make this clear: a friend and I purchased this game for the 2-player, splitscreen coop mode. Like Ghost Recon PS2, this mode is implemented extremely poorly. You can only play splitscreen on missions you have finished in campaign mode first. You cannot save after splitscreen missions.