www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Quake III: Revolution
6.1 out of 10

Quake III: Revolution

After an eternity fighting in the arenas of the Vadrigar, you em Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Quake III: Revolution

Showing 1-10 of 10
Overall 2
2.0

This game SUCKS

dark_warrior5 "dark_warrior5", Amazon
2 July 2004
  • Summary: I love Quake so when I heard about this one I was so glad so I bought it and brought it home and guess what it sucked it wasnt like Quake 2 or anything It pissed me off If you are a quake fan dont buy this one Its a real disapointment
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Buy this game for your PC

Plague]CWA[, Amazon
19 June 2001
  • Summary: I've spent hours playing Quake 3 on my PC. These hours add up to days, months even. I play online. I play in tournaments online. I can't get enough. The PS2 version is a mere shadow of the PC version. Graphics are muddy (even with an S-Video connection), control is awful.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Rent it first

Amazon
25 May 2001
  • Summary: I read such glowing reviews of this game that I went out and bought it without giving it a test drive. This has to be without a doubt the most boring game that I have ever played.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Quake 3: Revolution is not worth the money.

RJ, Amazon
8 May 2001
  • Summary: I would suggest renting this game before buying it. Yes, the graphics are good. Not the best I've seen but good. The part that this game goes down hill is game play. Your opponents just run around in the same pattern over and over. The controls aren't that in-depth.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Playstation butchers another one!

Amazon
13 April 2001
  • Summary: Ok lets be honest, Playstation has already bought out Dreamcast in their babyish attempt to get rid of competition. You're going to see Sonic the Hedgehog on PS2 soon. But one thing that itches me is that they butchered Quake 3.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

old games do not age well!

M. King, amazon.co.uk
3 June 2008
  • Summary: Simply put, this is a dodgy game with awful grafics, a wierd storyline and terrible controls. i know that this game is a cople of years old but then whats the point in buying it? i bought this game for around a quid and regretted the purchase.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Missing the Point?

Amazon
24 March 2005
  • Summary: This game is a major let down to any PS2 owner. The PS2's lack of in built of modem means that the developers have cut out the only reason to buy this game: ONLINE PLAY. The PC version had online play, the Dreamcast version had online play, yet the PS2 version is a strictly offline affair.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

old games do not age well!

M. King, Amazon
24 March 2005
  • Summary: Simply put, this is a dodgy game with awful grafics, a wierd storyline and terrible controls. i know that this game is a cople of years old but then whats the point in buying it? i bought this game for around a quid and regretted the purchase.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

This game SUCKS

dark_warrior5 "dark_warrior5", Amazon
2 July 2004
  • Summary: I love Quake so when I heard about this one I was so glad so I bought it and brought it home and guess what it sucked it wasnt like Quake 2 or anything It pissed me off If you are a quake fan dont buy this one Its a real disapointment
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Missing the Point?

Luis Miguel@oninet.pt, amazon.co.uk
22 March 2001
  • Summary: This game is a major let down to any PS2 owner. The PS2's lack of in built of modem means that the developers have cut out the only reason to buy this game: ONLINE PLAY. The PC version had online play, the Dreamcast version had online play, yet the PS2 version is a strictly offline affair.
  • Read full review