Reviews, reviews, reviews...

NCAA March Madness 2002
4.1 out of 10

NCAA March Madness 2002

With over 130 teams included, you can pick your squad, hone your Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with NCAA March Madness 2002

Showing 1-5 of 5
Overall 6
Gameplay 6
Graphics 8

March Madness 2002 (PS2)

Digital Sportspage
22 May 2009
  • Conclusion: March Madness 2002 is not worth buying, because of the limited replay value and shaky AI. However, the game shows promise with the "realistic" gameplay additions and excellent sound package. Even though this is the first March Madness for the PS2, this game feels terribly rushed.
  • Read full review
Overall 5

NCAA March Madness 2002

Playstation Illustrated
23 February 2004
  • Excerpt: When I review a game, I generally like to start off with praise before I criticize certain features I'm not fond of. I feel I'm always respectful to the creators with my comments, because they took the time to make something for we, the gamers, to play.
  • Read full review
Overall 7

NCAA March Madness 2002

Game Over Online
26 December 2003
  • Excerpt: Will basketball games ever stop appearing on consoles? Don’t hold your breath. Every year there are more basketball games released for consoles than I can count on my fingers. The NCAA March Madness series first appeared on the original PlayStation, with NCAA March Madness ‘99.
  • Read full review
Overall 7
Gameplay 8
Graphics 9
Sound 6
Control 9
Addiction 4

Expert Review

PSX Extreme
8 February 2002
  • Excerpt: Basketball sims have become quite popular as of late, unfortunately, with the exception of one (NBA 2K2) pretty much every ball sim on the market is an overall flop. NBA Live 2001 was a good first attempt, but not different than its PSX counterpart, gameplay wise.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
Gameplay 4
Usability 4

March Madness 2002

Sports Gaming Network
7 February 2001
  • Conclusion: Why settle for a poorly developed basketball game when there are better games out there? I had high hopes for March Madness 2002, but my hopes were quickly dashed. The game is easy to beat and short in replay value. This is one disappointing effort.
  • Read full review