Reviews and Problems with Medal of Honor: Vanguard
Showing 1-10 of 77
3 September 2007
Summary: Yes, its yet another WW2 fps. The only difference is te airborne aspect, which plays a minimal role in the game. Not much is given to change the formulas here, so the choice to get the same game youve played 50 times before is yours.
Summary: im no expert in giving the right kinda rate and i dosn't help if you havn't played it before.The big question is will it live up to to the last game?Will you get your own set of recruits to help?Mini quests in each mission?The abbilty to kill a leader?
Summary: The Medal of Honor series pretty much cemented the WWII shooter genre into the console market with the first one being on the original Playstation and receiving rave reviews. After 11 (or more) different games on consoles, handhelds and PC. This series, and it's genre are tired.
Excerpt: Medal of Honor’s fourth and final PS2 outing is a dishearteningly threadbare effort. Vanguard is desperately short on new ideas and content, whilst it’s ageing game engine and misguided emphasis on the ‘squad’ element make it feel like an anaemic Call of Duty clone.
Pros: Simple fun, parachute jumps are cool
Cons: No ambition, derivative mission design, short, poor visuals
Excerpt: Medal of Honor's fourth and final PS2 outing is a dishearteningly threadbare effort. Vanguard is desperately short on new ideas and content, whilst it's ageing game engine and misguided emphasis on the 'squad' element make it feel like an anaemic Call of Duty clone.