Reviews and Problems with Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
Showing 1-10 of 20
The name says it all
16 January 2006
Summary: The Fellowship is great but a rpg. The Fellowship is based only on the first movie or book (it depends which way you look at it). In the game you play as frodo with a little dagger but for more violence you play as Aragorn (Strider) and Gandalf.
Summary: This game is totally not bad. The graphics are not the best but they are good. You don't have to read the book but if you do then you will understand the story. The characters don't look like the one in the movie, but it's on the cover 'Based on the literary works of J.R.R Tolkien'.
Summary: looking at its current ps2 and pc reviews i think its players were expecting a game that would somehow do the book justice. i think this is an unrealistic thought. fellowship of the ring is a good game that sketchily takes you through the first book.
Why does everyone think that this game is so rubbish?
16 January 2006
Summary: I'm not quite sure why previous reviewers have made this game out to be boring and a complete waste of time any money. Its great! Ok, in place it strays abit from the book but so what, no game that is based on a book or film is ever going to be exactly the same, and to be honest, its quite a...
Summary: Let me begin this review by proclaiming proudly that I am at once an avid gamer, and a J.R.R. Tolkien fanatic. I was instantly skeptical about a game based upon Tolkien's works, as all past offerings have been lackluster and unworthy of their source materials.
Summary: I almost didn't get this game due to the reviews I've been reading but I took a chance because I loved the book and wanted to see the Tom Bombadillo (sp?) character & others left out of the movie. (To the reviewer who said the lines from this game are the same as the lines from the movie, ....