Summary: Wow I really wanted this game when I saw the screens, but GOD BURN THIS GAME TO HELL. This is no First Person Shooter, this is a First Person Piece of S**t. WTF were they thinking? The playable characters had no diffrences at all. The stealth guy wasn't that slealthy with the NPC A.I.
Summary: Take it from someone who owns killzone and a decent Broadband connection when i say that this game sucks ass. This game is certainly not better than Halo 1 or 2. The controls are set funky and this game doesn't have the best graphics. The controls are twitchy so you cant aim worth crap.
Summary: Perhaps in 2004 when it came out it was an impressive game. In 2008 I found it to be highly over-rated- simple plot, unimpressive choice of weapons, unsophisticated tasks (even on the hardest levels).
Mediocre shooter....and there are hundreds of these....
Entropy "Entropy", amazon.co.uk
31 January 2007
Summary: We bought Killzone as it was a budget game, on the whole it is by no means a bad game, especially if you like shooters. The biggest problem is the gameplay, specifically the controls, it is very hard to retaliate quickly when someone is shooting at you. The aiming system leaves a lot to be desired.
Conclusion: I bought this game just because of the rewievs and it really disappointed me . . . The guy in the screen is so small u can barely see whats going on . . . Tried it for 1 hour and never picked it up again. Was a very bad buy in my opinion
Conclusion: The game itself has no faults. Very thought out and the graphics aren't half bad considering its for the Psp. But the camera angle is what destroys this would be classic. nothing short of terrible would be best to discribe it, with the everlasting struggle with the view it seems impossible to enjoy...
Summary: Killzone ist ein sehr durchschnittlicher Shooter mit einer recht guten Grafik, zumindest auf den ersten Blick. Beim zweiten bemerkt man, dass die Grafik ab und zu ruckelt und auch sonst gönnt sich das Game den ein oder anderen "Aussetzer".