www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

High Heat Major League Baseball 2003
6.0 out of 10

High Heat Major League Baseball 2003

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with High Heat Major League Baseball 2003

Showing 1-10 of 20
Overall 8
8.0

The best baseball game of 2002

J. Hall, Amazon
18 May 2002
  • Summary: Okay, I'll admit it: this looks an awful lot like a really good PS One game. But great graphics don't make a great game; check out All-Star Baseball 2003 if you don't believe me. (Better yet, DON'T. I should have known better than to play a game sponsored by a Yankee!
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Probably the best baseball game on the PS2

ffootballguru27, Amazon
18 May 2002
  • Summary: High Heat 2003 for the PS2 is a great baseball video game, despite the lack of a Franchise mode which is the biggest problem with this game. I am used to playing Sega's World Series Baseball series on the Dreamcast and personally think both series' are basically equal except that High Heat's...
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Definatley a great game except.

JerryG, Amazon
17 May 2002
  • Summary: Well first of all let me say that this game for the PS2 does not have the best graphics, however really fun. The only real problem I have with the game is the schedule! did anyone bother to bring up a Red Sox schedule before making this game? c'mon 3DO you guys a supposed to be pros here.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Close to perfect

David Haneke, Amazon
17 May 2002
  • Summary: This game is very underrated from the reviews I have read. I would give it a perfect rating if not for the lack of off the field managing. The only problem I have with the entire game is the lack of injuries, no disabled list and you only get a 25 man roster (no triple A teams and a very small...
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Best baseball game out for PS2

Mike, Amazon
17 May 2002
  • Summary: As a person who spent years playing nothing but the Triple Play series, it was hard for me to switch to something different. But, EA sports made it an easier decision by pretty much ruining Triple Play. So, I now had to find a replacement. All-Star Baseball was just too hard...
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

With this one, I can see myself playing a whole season.

Nathan L. Kraft, Amazon
17 May 2002
  • Summary: I've already read a bunch of reviews on the pros and cons of this game. Here's some comments I'd like to make that may or may not have been overlooked. I'm used to the All-Star Baseball series and that means I'm used to never drawing a walk. The pitchers in those games never threw a 3-2 ball..
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

best baseball for PS2

Stresspuppy, Amazon
17 May 2002
  • Summary: HH 2003 has much improved graphics and an updated roster over 2002. given the High Heat legacy, it plays well giving a good mix of walks vs. strikeouts... in addition to the general difficulty setting (rookie, pro, allstar, mvp) the game also allows you to adjust a general setting to make the game...
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

High Heat Baseball 2003 Hits A Grand Slam

Amazon
17 May 2002
  • Summary: After playing this game for the first time, I loved it. The gameplay is great, the stadiums are great, and the players are fantastic. High Heat beats out it's competitors by far. I have yet to play All-star b-ball, but it's better than triple play and MLB.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

True to America's favorite past time

waddellm, Amazon
17 May 2002
  • Summary: High Heat 2002 was a "not very well crafted" baseball game with extraordinary gameplay that is so realistic that you almost feel as if you're witnessing the game first hand. Half of the statistics were horribly flawed and some(saves) were not even recorded.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

High Heat is better than last year, Still not great

SammySosa21, Amazon
17 May 2002
  • Summary: While i was very dissapointed with last years high heat, this years version surprised me (and yes i do actually own it). Gameplay and graphics are much improved and the announcers voices were crisp and clean. I was also surprised to see that the rosters were also as up to date as they could be (i.e.
  • Read full review
Next page >>