Reviews and Problems with Call of Duty: World at War
Showing 1-10 of 122
Alright..But Nothing To Brag About.
MOHRuskie1987 , GameStop
27 May 2013
Summary: This game is alright for a casual gamer. The graphics are poor seeing how it came out a few years ago. The storyline is quite boring if you ask me honestly. It is a short game and can be beaten very quickly. Honestly it's a good game, but not worth the price.
Summary: this game sucks, if you want a real FPS get a ps3 and the real world at war, if you cant play M then wait, dont waste money, no zombies, its not intense, no gore, no online, im failing to see the point of this game
Summary: I bought this game a few years ago and I loved it. I'm happy they a made another Call of Duty for the PS2. This game is Great. Storyline: Mixed up, but fun. Graphics: Better than 1-3, but not the best. Sound: Good, but off at times. If your a Call of Duty gamer, then buy this game.
Summary: Definitely the best COD for PS2. Graphics are better then all of the rest but not as good as COD2 for PC (I'm old school COD player. All the way back to #1). It's difficult to spot bad guys in the asian jungle scenes. It doesn't take alot of shots to kill, you just have to wait for the m to fall down. The option for a "sticky" aim or not is great to aid in increasing difficulty in levels. I do wish that there was a "lean" option for when you're shooting.
Summary: Begins!!! World at War is a fun game for PS2. It is better than Finest Hour, its not as good as Big Red One(Haven't played COD 3). Though different from the normal version, this is a great choice for last gen owners.