www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Brothers In Arms: Road to Hill 30
7.0 out of 10

Brothers In Arms: Road to Hill 30

The paratroopers of the 101st Airborne Division are dropped into Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Brothers In Arms: Road to Hill 30

Showing 1-10 of 77

User Review

llamayarmybar, Metacritic
27 May 2013
  • Summary: What an ugly game. Even compared to the original Call of Duty its ugly. The textures are blurry, the gun models are poor, and the actual skins of the soldiers are just terrifyingly bad.
  • Read full review

User Review

Horrux, Metacritic
13 March 2012
  • Summary: Is it worth playing you ask? Well, if your ambition is to play EVERY WW2 game around, then maybe yes. The graphics are poor. The animations are poor. The AI is poor. It's a poor game. Is it super-awful? No. No game-breaking bugs either.
  • Read full review

User Review

JoshP.S., Metacritic
18 October 2009
  • Summary: A fairly solid tactical historical shooter. The only major faults are with the contextual commands- occasionally causing you to order your squad to attack when you want them to move, and to mount guns when you want to reload- and the friendly AI occasionally not firing when they have clear shots and...
  • Read full review

User Review

Matt, Metacritic
3 August 2007
  • Summary: I had such hopes that this would be a good game, but instead, it was a bad minigame drawn out to cover the plot. The mechanics of the minigame are simple: see the Germans, shot in the general direction of the Germans, tell your squad to stop taking cover from the wrong direction and shoot at the...
  • Read full review

User Review

Ralph, Metacritic
11 April 2005
  • Summary: Quite realistic. Certainly not a game that you can use gung ho tactics in. Forces you t think through each encounter. Nice step up from Call of Duty. Load times are a little on the slow side. 1 minute to start, 30 seconds to restart.
  • Read full review

User Review

BruceT., Metacritic
1 April 2005
  • Summary: I agree that this is an overrated game. Tried this game because of the high Metascore. Poor graphics. Just based on flanking tactics, and gets pretty monotonous and annoying sometimes.
  • Read full review

User Review

TimR., Metacritic
1 April 2005
  • Summary: I've never played a game that got such good industry reviews and failed to come even close to those reviews. I keep thinking I must have played a different game. I just don't get - this game is not fun. It is incredibly repetitive.
  • Read full review

User Review

DickM., Metacritic
21 March 2005
  • Summary: Disappointing. Very scripted. All action is based on flanking trick. Outdated graphics. Sound is too quiet and no EAX support.
  • Read full review

User Review

SagatO., Metacritic
21 March 2005
  • Summary: The big issue with this game on the PC are the bugs. A massive amount of people are currently unable to play it, even on relatively new systems. They are now left in limbo until the developer releases its v1.03 patch.
  • Read full review

User Review

DeanK., Metacritic
20 March 2005
  • Summary: Big Disappointment. As realisitic as a chocolate kettle.
  • Read full review
Next page >>