www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Brothers In Arms: Road to Hill 30
7.1 out of 10

Brothers In Arms: Road to Hill 30

The paratroopers of the 101st Airborne Division are dropped into Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Brothers In Arms: Road to Hill 30

Showing 1-10 of 76

User Review

tupungato, Metacritic
14 November 2014
  • Summary: I finished a lot of FPS games. I enjoy World War II games. I played a few instances of Call of Duty and Medal of Honor. The graphics is OK, the sound is OK. The game itself is not typical. It focuses on tactics and leading a team of men, giving them orders.
  • Read full review

User Review

PvtJackson, Metacritic
23 January 2014
  • Summary: I have only one word to describe the game in general: AMAZING ! Ubisoft successfully got rid of the shadows created by other WWII FPS games created by Activision or EA such as Call of Duty, Battlefield,... by offering players a chance to become both a soldier and a commander on the field.
  • Read full review

User Review

DRiVER_helsinki, Metacritic
28 December 2013
  • Summary: This was another disappointment by gearbox i only now remembered to write, as i saw told old home video where i play this at background of the video and hahaha curse alot, while my dad try play guitar for camera Too bad the gearbox seems have taken a habit of selling games with built hype and...
  • Read full review

User Review

Chechoo4, Metacritic
6 September 2013
  • Summary: Yes, this is the best game about World War II, all the highlight of the game is not in the game, and in the plot. Compared with the plot Hollywood masterpieces suck.
  • Read full review

User Review

llamayarmybar, Metacritic
27 May 2013
  • Summary: What an ugly game. Even compared to the original Call of Duty its ugly. The textures are blurry, the gun models are poor, and the actual skins of the soldiers are just terrifyingly bad.
  • Read full review

User Review

Mosstromo, Metacritic
12 March 2013
  • Summary: Maybe back when it came out (March 15, 2005, according to Metacritic) the graphics were something to be praised, but today (when compared with other games from the same time) they looked like they must've been something just close to the average.
  • Read full review

User Review

Sorry15, Metacritic
4 August 2012
  • Summary: Someone said that this reminds of ,,Band of Brothers'' and it really does. It creates a bond between the characters and brings a nice, tactical gameplay and also amazing story. Its a special game with a unique viewing over WWII, where you can command a squad of soldiers and take consequences of your...
  • Read full review

User Review

kanefriessner, Metacritic
17 July 2012
  • Summary: This game is one of the worst ww2 games I ever seen. The graphics is not good (see another games from 2005 for eg. COD2 to comparison) but it's not bad. The story is not bad, but a little boring. The fighting is not so good in the game.
  • Read full review

User Review

Horrux, Metacritic
13 March 2012
  • Summary: Is it worth playing you ask? Well, if your ambition is to play EVERY WW2 game around, then maybe yes. The graphics are poor. The animations are poor. The AI is poor. It's a poor game. Is it super-awful? No. No game-breaking bugs either.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Was OK

NobleGuy, Amazon
4 weeks ago
  • Summary: Having played the latest one of these (Hell's Highway), I was looking forward to playing this one. It was OK, but HH is a massive step forward in terms of playability and graphics.
  • Read full review
Next page >>