Reviews and Problems with Brothers In Arms: Road to Hill 30
Showing 1-10 of 49
23 January 2014
Summary: I have only one word to describe the game in general: AMAZING ! Ubisoft successfully got rid of the shadows created by other WWII FPS games created by Activision or EA such as Call of Duty, Battlefield,... by offering players a chance to become both a soldier and a commander on the field. Flawless combination of authentic tactics and battle skills is one excellent point that makes this game stand out compared to the rest of WWII FPS ones.
Summary: This was another disappointment by gearbox i only now remembered to write, as i saw told old home video where i play this at background of the video and hahaha curse alot, while my dad try play guitar for camera Too bad the gearbox seems have taken a habit of selling games with built hype and putting less effort of finishing fixing and updating their games for players
Summary: What an ugly game. Even compared to the original Call of Duty its ugly. The textures are blurry, the gun models are poor, and the actual skins of the soldiers are just terrifyingly bad. The real joke is the gameplay though and you will be walking from cover to cover suppressing Germans with a few rounds, then flanking them to finish just about every section of the linear missions. At least in Call of duty their wasn't some bizarre broken squad A.I. you had to babysit.
Summary: Maybe back when it came out (March 15, 2005, according to Metacritic) the graphics were something to be praised, but today (when compared with other games from the same time) they looked like they must've been something just close to the average. Critics and users alike have praised the sound design, and in that case I agree that there seems to have been great effort to fill every nook of the game with noise and chatter.
Summary: Someone said that this reminds of ,,Band of Brothers'' and it really does. It creates a bond between the characters and brings a nice, tactical gameplay and also amazing story. Its a special game with a unique viewing over WWII, where you can command a squad of soldiers and take consequences of your orders in every mission.
Summary: This game is one of the worst ww2 games I ever seen. The graphics is not good (see another games from 2005 for eg. COD2 to comparison) but it's not bad. The story is not bad, but a little boring. The fighting is not so good in the game. Usually, you have to shoot 5-10 bullets into your enemy's body to kill him. It's ridiculous. Your teammate's AI is poor. They running like chickens in the garden. When someone is killed in your fireteam it's a big problem you think.
Summary: Is it worth playing you ask? Well, if your ambition is to play EVERY WW2 game around, then maybe yes. The graphics are poor. The animations are poor. The AI is poor. It's a poor game. Is it super-awful? No. No game-breaking bugs either. It's just that the fun factor ranks up to the tune of "ever so slightly" fun. Replay MOHAA if you can instead. Give this one a pass, because if you really enjoy it, you must be brain dead. 5/10.