Reviews and Problems with Brothers In Arms: Road to Hill 30
Showing 1-10 of 76
14 November 2014
Summary: I finished a lot of FPS games. I enjoy World War II games. I played a few instances of Call of Duty and Medal of Honor. The graphics is OK, the sound is OK. The game itself is not typical. It focuses on tactics and leading a team of men, giving them orders.
Summary: I have only one word to describe the game in general: AMAZING ! Ubisoft successfully got rid of the shadows created by other WWII FPS games created by Activision or EA such as Call of Duty, Battlefield,... by offering players a chance to become both a soldier and a commander on the field.
Summary: This was another disappointment by gearbox i only now remembered to write, as i saw told old home video where i play this at background of the video and hahaha curse alot, while my dad try play guitar for camera Too bad the gearbox seems have taken a habit of selling games with built hype and...
Summary: Maybe back when it came out (March 15, 2005, according to Metacritic) the graphics were something to be praised, but today (when compared with other games from the same time) they looked like they must've been something just close to the average.
Summary: Someone said that this reminds of ,,Band of Brothers'' and it really does. It creates a bond between the characters and brings a nice, tactical gameplay and also amazing story. Its a special game with a unique viewing over WWII, where you can command a squad of soldiers and take consequences of your...
Summary: This game is one of the worst ww2 games I ever seen. The graphics is not good (see another games from 2005 for eg. COD2 to comparison) but it's not bad. The story is not bad, but a little boring. The fighting is not so good in the game.
Summary: Is it worth playing you ask? Well, if your ambition is to play EVERY WW2 game around, then maybe yes. The graphics are poor. The animations are poor. The AI is poor. It's a poor game. Is it super-awful? No. No game-breaking bugs either.