Reviews and Problems with Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood
Showing 1-10 of 21
awesome shooter, but some flaws.
19 June 2013
Summary: This is a very awesome fps. it has a good and long storyline that will keep you entertained for a while. Some flaws are lag. when you get in a big fire fight / alot of shooting, it slows down. also, when you kill someone, you know because it lags a bit. Its a little hard to aim a long distances (swaying sights), but that adds to the realism factor. I like that you can command a squad. squad AI is decent, and they really help!
Summary: Overall, this game is great. It brings to the table what the first game in the series introduced, the ability to command additional AI units. There is a lot of additional strategy involved (i.e. flanking, suppressing fire, armor units, etc.). The gameplay can be somewhat difficult at first, though, and certain missions, or sections therein, are extremely difficult to overcome without taking gratuitous losses.
Summary: Lets start off by saying this is not like the first one, it may seem like it but the story is 100% different you play sgt. hartsock, and in the beginning you talk to a guy about what happened at road to hill 30, and what happened those three days and what not. Now i played the first one i have it and i say this game is much better in every way because its improved on the ps2 then the first some game reviewers say that this is a mediocre and stuff like that!
Summary: The original game in the series (road to hill 30?) is not too different from this sequel, so the review applies to that game as well. The core concept is the use of 1 or 2 squads (depending on the mission): a fire (support) team that's to be used to suppress an enemy, and an assault team to be used to move closer to the enemy and finish them off. It is a 1st person game, so you're free to run around and do whatever you want.
Summary: This is my first World War II game and i like it. Its good nearly (but not quite) great.if i had to rate it out of 10 it would be a 7.9/10. I have heard of Medal Of Honor and Call Of Duty but never played them nor have i played BIA:Road To Hill 30(BIA:RTH30). I had the choice between Call Of Duty 2:Big Red One(COD2:BRO) and BIA:EIB and i went for BIA2 because i heard its the most authentic WWII game plus its got strategy rather than "Run-n-gun" that MOH and COD uses,not...
Summary: This game is way better - WAY BETTER - than Road to Hill 30. There have been many improvements. The levels are larger, the enemies are smarter, and there's co-op play. It also features a skirmish mode that lets you play as Germans and Americans. The greatest thing about this game is the improved enemy AI. In the last game, I was dissappointed that the enemy just sat behind cover and popped up and shot every once and a while. In this game, you have to be way more careful.
Summary: Pretty good. Don't like the burden of having a squad to contend with but, some players must. I prefer one-person shooters and whilst this is good in settings and action it should have been just that - a first person shooter game.
Summary: Gritty, dirty, vivid. If you have ever wondered what it would have been like to have fought in 1940's Normandy, then this game is probably just as good as a veteran's auto-biography. Set entirely from photos taken from reconnaisance planes, this game really puts you in to the perspective of Sgt Baker's, now Sgt Harstock's, "Dozen". The game starts were Hill 30 left of. War-torn, bombed out Carentan, with a familiar gang of soldiers.