Summary: History is full of games that boasted fantastic concepts, but failed to deliver when all of its brilliant ideas were put into practice. Some of the most creative games are also some of the absolute worst, as whoever came up with it simply lacked the funds, time or talent to see it through.
Excerpt: We’re just a month into 2011 and already we have an early contender for worst game of the year. That game is Mindjack. It’s unfortunate too because Mindjack presents an interesting concept. It’s just that everything else about this sci-fi cover-based third-person shooter is an absolute mess.
Conclusion: The best feature is the inclusion of local and online co-operative gameplay. This is completely separate to the single-player story, and demands a different mind-set from the player to complete its puzzles.
Excerpt: After watching the trailer for Square Enix’s latest sci-fi cover-based shooter, Mindjack, you’ll be thinking one of two things. Firstly, can it get any better than eliminating your enemies with nothing else but the power of your mind?
Conclusion: So is it worth your precious time and money? I suppose it all depends on how much enjoyment you derive from this short game’s multiplayer. If you like to jump into people’s games and prevent them from progressing, you may find more than your fair share of replay value in this title.
Excerpt: Normally this would be where I’d open things up with a little bit of personal backstory relating to the game I’m about to review. But this time around, I can’t really think of anything I could possibly use as a personal anecdote to properly convey my feelings about Mindjack that without getting...
Excerpt: First Impressions My reaction is I believe that our readers have the right to be warned when they’re going to play a bad game. Like the PEGI rating system, I believe that some games should be slapped with a large sticker that says “This game causes severe mental anguish – avoid at all costs”.