Reviews and Problems with Medal of Honor: Warfighter
Showing 1-10 of 151
You have to think when you play this...
ddog987 , GameStop
1 week ago
Summary: what people dont realize is that medal of honor and battlefield are two totally differant games, battlefield is more competative and less horrifying warfare, made more for fun, medal of honor is very fun but is not like battlefield when you're like "oh yay im killing people!" you are like "oh man, i just killed someone...
Excerpt: Purchased this game for my son. He loved the game. So I guess that means he beat it. I'm personally not a gamer but I have 4 boys ranging from 32 to 11 and they are all gamers. We purchase lots of games from Toys r Us!!!
Summary: This game is great. It has a fantastic multiplayer and a fantastic single player. Just because this game didnt come out in november and wasnt called battlefield or call of duty no one bought it. Its a shame but its the truth. I still play this game from time to time and people still play online but not a ton.
Summary: Medal of Honor (2010) was not as bad, to me, as people said. It had its charms and curses, but it held up. Then comes Medal of Honor: Warfighter. I was excited but slightly confused on everyone's reaction to it, but to each their own. I found the game to be a lot better than Medal of Honor (2010) and a much better story line. The game moved at a faster rate and the controls were fluid and almost real.