Summary: This game did not impress me at all. Electronic Arts needs to forget about making modern warfare games for their Medal Of Honor series and get back to making World War II genre games. The game is alright, but nothing to go crazy for. I'll admit though, it was awesome to get MOH Frontline with it though. Frontline looks awesome on the PS3 and they did a great job re-mastering the graphics! So I guess you could say it's worth the money.
Summary: I Personally Thought The game Was OK. I Didn't Like It, I Didn't Hate It. The Only Part I Actually Enjoyed of This Game Was The Campaign All Else Was A Big Let Down. The Multiplayer was Glitchy And It Felt Like You Were Running In Sand. However The Running Mechanics Never Changed In MOH: Warfighter. You Ran The Same Way And It Still felt Like You Were Running In Sand. The Game Isn't Terrible I Would Just Rate It A Six. I Would Recommend This Game For Hardcore Gamers.
Summary: The gameplay is awesome and fun. Unlike CoD (which is one of my favorite FPS's), Medal of Honor focuses on different groups, including U.S. Navy Seals, Delta Force, U.S. Army Rangers, and Air Force. The graphics are reminiscent of CoD in a way. All in all this is a great game. Some cons of this game are that there isn't a large selection of guns, bad multiplayer, and low lasting appeal.
Summary: good game, but barely worth the $10 i paid for it on black friday. decent campaign, though rather short and lacking a good bit of emotion. great multiplayer, besides the stupid spawn system, and the fact there are currently....let me see.......836 people online. nobody plays it anymore, which is a shame. in conclusion, i would recommend one of the great games below, if, of course, you don't already own!
Excerpt: So there I was in my local game store trading in the new madden, when I see this game this game called medal of honor. I think back to when I first heard of this series(awesome linken park trailer) and thought to myself: if they they had a trailer that awesome it must not be too bad. I WAS WRONG. First off, I'm an avid FPS player(MW2,gears,and killzone) so I think I know a good FPS shooter when I play one. I'll start off with the story.
Summary: I think this is a game that EA russed. I would have just not made a Medal of Honor and been working on a Battlefield 4 or Battlefield Bad Company 3. I would wait for one of those game or get Assassin's Creed Revelations!
Summary: I got this game knowing the medal of honor franchise wasn't the most awesome first-person shooter out there. But the Campaign was pretty cool. There were veichles and explosions with a not so spectacular bang. There were some holes in the story line and that made it confusing. Though i have to say it gave Black Ops for its money, yet still didnt match up But over all it was a good experience... Until I got to the multi-player.
Summary: milatary shooters have come a long way xince the world war 2 days. with the release of call of duty modern warfare shooters have been trying to top it in basically every way. and almost all of them have been as good as modern warfare, with mw2 being the best. unfortunately medal of honor falls short in every aspect. its hard to believe that the same team that made battlefield bad company made this garbage. on paper it seems great, but in action, is horrible.