Summary: I would rather play though CoD MW1, CoD MW2 and Black Ops all over again before playing this. I have yet to play multiplayer online but comparing the background graphics to CoD not even worth the time to try.
Pros: Game has great locations and can use the night vision at anytime during the game.
Cons: Polygons break. Video choppy. On occasion you can walk through your partner. Graphics are awful compared to Black Ops. Both Modern Warfare had better graphics than this game. Paid $25 for it and still think I over paid.
FUN, but WAY too short in one player campaign mode
19 December 2010
Summary: This was a very realistic, fun game where it felt like you were a special ops person on a mission in Afghanistan. The problem is it is WAY too short in regular campaign mode. I have played literally ALL of the Medal of Honor ("MOH") games made, from the PS1 to current. I've always loved them all, except maybe Frontline, for either the replayability or multiplayer (the OLD "multiplayer" meaning with a buddy NEXT to you).
Summary: I was really excited from this game to come out for PS3. Picked up my copy and burned though it in an almost comical amount of time. It's way to short compared to the COD games, etc. The graphics were, good. The story line lacked something. And, the biggy. It's buggy. Freezes up from time to time so you need to go back to the last checkpoint. All-in-all, a good game, but very let down at this price point. The new COD is a much better game.
Summary: Singleplayer is short, cant be more than 8 or 9 missions total. The multiplayer is fast paced but no depth, very limited customization, i found it lagging alot too, but on the bright side it does have decent graphics.