Summary: Well i picked this up maybe 5 months ago for $5, and lets say that this game is definitely a type of game many will share different opinions on and ill based my opinions based on what i played. Well like most shooters the campaign is short, but the story is boring and repetitive. Im surprised to say that the graphics look great, but levels can get confusing since the game sometimes dont give clear directions.
Summary: I got this game yesterday and thought it would be like COD. I was wrong. Sorry to tell you, but this game sucks. It's probably worth around $9.99. The graphics are terrible, and the guns don't even look real. DO NOT BUY!!!
Summary: So MOH could never get right, (whats new), and the fact that i wasted a full 59.99 on this game bothers me even more. Depite the ESRB ratings, this game's campaghn has plenty of blood and GORE. but don't be too disappointed, kids bcz this game is not even worth $20. The campaghn is short and laggy, doesn't have the same controls as multiplayer, its repetitive, and the concept ( the war on terror) is little contriversial.
Summary: medal of honor is a game that i got for christmas this year. if i had known what the result would've been, i would've asked for a different game. the graphics on it were not that good. call of duty is definitely superior in that category. the overall gameplay of medal of honor is not that great either. i don't have online yet so i don't know about the multiplayer, and the single player campaign was really dry and very hard to get into.
Cons: Poor range of weapons. Squad mates who constantly block your shot. Ridiculous "invisible walls" as mentioned in the review above. Clunky controls with no option to use R2 as the trigger. WAAAAY TOO SHORT - I completed it in an afternoon.