Reviews and Problems with MAG: Massive Action Game
Showing 1-10 of 303
27 July 2013
Summary: Since this game is multiplayer only, this game doesn't really deserve 5/5. But, the multiplayer part is great. There are some things you have got to understand before getting this game : 1) This is a teamwork based game. If you have tons of friends who are interested in this game, and you are interested in this and want to actually use teamwork, buy this game. You wouldn't want to miss the epic 256 player battle.
Summary: This game is good, however it could be made better. The only amazing part is 256 player battles! the maps are huge! the graphics kinda suck and its kind of hard to keep track of friends. But it is still amazing! Battlefield is better though!
Summary: Amazing 256 players in game, another online multiplayer only game on PS3 like warhawk,its shock to see a small batallion of armies on screen but they shld adjust the balancing of maps and squad to even better,especially for a game that main in multiplayer.
Summary: black ops is good and so is mw3 ... but mag is epic. the maps are so big and it gives u a great advantage if u like to snipe. mw3 feels like im on a football feild...mag is like the stadium, parking lot and more....more room to move and fight.
MAG a massive multiplayer delivers (even few years later)
Patrick Roethler, Amazon
30 April 2012
Summary: In the fall of 2011 I bought MAG, I had enjoyed MW2 and was looking for a multiplayer shooter. I knew that MAG had been released about the time or shortly after MWF2. I do feel that the graphics are acceptable for the time of release, and I believe that they still hold up well. If you buy the game today 4/30/2012 you will be slightly dissappointed if you have been playing the newer military shooters that were released like MWF3 or BF3.