www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Lord-of-the-rings-conquest-ps3.34121625
6.0 out of 10

Lord of the Rings: Conquest

The Lord of the Rings: Conquest puts players into the thick of t Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Lord of the Rings: Conquest

Showing 1-5 of 5
Overall 2
2.0

One Star

Angel E, Nadal Ponce, Amazon
3 weeks ago
  • Summary: The game do not works, is damage , you can see the scratch on the disc.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

One Star

Jason P., Amazon
27 May 2013
Overall 2
2.0

EA killed online play

Mudd, Amazon
20 March 2010
  • Summary: Fun game, but online play was by far the best part. Its the Battlefield series based in the LOTR universe. Good times...until Electronic Arts pulled the plug on servers supporting online multiplayer on March 16, 2010 (14 months after game introduction). No multiplayer = no fun for this title.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

WARNING - NO ONLINE PLAY!

Mirror_Matter, Amazon
24 August 2009
  • Summary: Unfortunately, there were no recent reviews of Lord of the Rings: Conquest when I bought two copies to explain that Electronic Arts stopped supporting online play for this title back in March of 2010. More dissappointing, Amazon continues to advertise that it does have online play and none of the vendors add a note of warning.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Lord of the Letdown: Flop Fest

d_gus, Ebay
10 August 2009
  • Summary: Originally I had hoped to play this game and platinum it. However, it is an inferior product, and I feel bad that it even bears the LOTR name. The single player campaign is dull, unimaginative and monotonous; before I finished playing through it once, I found myself bored with the game. The cut scenes do feature Hugo Weaving’s (Lord Eldenrod) voice, but they are extremely wordy. This detracts from the game. The online multiplayer is even worse.
  • Read full review