Reviews and Problems with The History Channel: Battle for the Pacific
Showing 1-10 of 15
YesImCool , GameStop
28 March 2012
Summary: I got this game today and i absolutly hated it the graphics were pretty good but the gameplay was terrible no wonder they did not follow it up call of duty and medal of honor are both 100% better than this they should improve this extremely well
Summary: I purchased this game for about $20 and it was worth $5. I beat it in less than one hour and it took me about 2 weeks to beat battlefield bad company. The controls were ok, but it was hard to use objects ( machine guns ect.) because you needed to be at the exact right place. Their are not many guns and the game is mainly a run and gun game with people running at you. I returned this game the next day.
Summary: I TOTALLY Agree with "sipmac", this game was WAY Under PAR compared to other war games. Every time I tried playing it I would end up with a killer migrane headache, due to the grainy & choppy graphics. That never happened with other games that I play, just this one. Stay away & save your money, your wallet & your head will thank you.
Summary: This is the Junk game I have ever bought waste of money. Totally socks!! The graphics is very bad and the way the game was created really really bad. This stupid seargent in the game is terribly anoying me keep shouting at me.
Summary: Hi, I'm here to tell you about Battle for the Pacific. Battle For the Pacific is one of the worst games I have ever played! It has a good story line, and the graphics are okay, but everything else sucks. When you shoot one of the guns in the game it sounds like something out of a PS1. I am also going to add that this game has no difficulty to it what so ever. I promise you if you buy this game, that you will wish you never would have bought it.
Summary: I'm so totally disappointed in all respects I can't give it one star but only because I have to in order to add this "review". Not worth even half it's price. No, really ...can I ask History Channel to give me my money back? I will gladly pay the shipping cost off my pocket to send it back for a refund.
Summary: Don't bother. There are so many better ways to spend those 40 plus dollars. From the graphics, to the level design, to the sound effects, to almost everything you can imagine, this game is a serious regression to the pre-Medal of Honor series era. Definitely not a game you'd like to see on your PS3 (especially if you just happened to bought the console and are buying your first games.) Such a pitty to see the History Channel -which I love to watch- promoting this game.
Summary: To start off, this game lacks any kind of structure at all. Maybe I'm just spoiled with Call of Duty 4 or Medal of Honor but I figured since Activision did such a grreat job with COD4, I would give it a try. Now I'm 40 dollars more poor and I wasted 2 hours of my life. I didn't even finish the game it was that bad. All you do is follow around the same guy that says the same thing. The controls are way off. The AI in the game is horrific.