Reviews and Problems with The History Channel: Battle for the Pacific
Showing 1-10 of 44
Battle for the Pacific-Playstation 3... finally a First Person Shooter game where you're not chasing Nazi's.
Daniel S. Ciurro "dciurro", Amazon
3 weeks ago
Summary: Not the best first person shooter game that I have played, but it's good enough. Because it's PS3, there is a lot more detail and much better sound. The main reason that I bought this game is because of the absolute lack of WWII Pacific games. Other then that, not much different from any other fps game.
Summary: This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. SPOILERSSPOILERSSPOILERS this game is great it is sexy i love pawn stars i game me a boner i jerked so hard i cam in 2 seconds go to p or nuh hu buh dawt cuh oh muh balls in my as crak SPOILERSSPOILERSSPOILERS … Expand
Summary: Saben que? es la primera vez que un juego no me parece tan bueno y voy a decir porque. 1) graficos 7.8 son los mismos que en el soldier of fortune 3, y es obvio porque utiliza su mismo motor, aunque son buenos, son muy anticuados ya y no estan tan geniales. tecnologia 9 como siempre su brillante optimizacion me sorprende y su fluidez de controles tambien, pero podrian haber añadido otras mecanicas de juego como correr o atacar con el cuchillo.
Summary: I got this game today and i absolutly hated it the graphics were pretty good but the gameplay was terrible no wonder they did not follow it up call of duty and medal of honor are both 100% better than this they should improve this extremely well
Summary: Dear Stupid person who actually wants to buy this piece of bullsh*t. Go to the mirror and look at yourself, is this who you want to be? Someone who likes extremely crappy history tie ins? If don't want to be this anymore, I'm glad not so stupid person anymore, but if still want the game, continue reading. Now let's start at presentation, hmmm not so bad for this crap oh wait what's this are my dead foes floating a couple of inches of the ground? Crap.