Summary: Simple pro's & con's list Pro's Single player/ Splitscreen skirmish, campaign, & multiplayer Different fps mechanics/concepts Split-screen is ok Con's No multiplayer, the servers are dead Maps are dull and boring Weapons are low-poly & badly textured Graphics suck, its like a ps2 game with...
Summary: The game is lacking so much, the campaign was just boring, Ther were few guns to chose from, it was like it was a game that didint have much work or time put into it, However i found the online fun due to the fact of having many friends who played it but that is the only reason why.
Lisa Shea "be the change you wish to see in the world", Amazon
6 July 2008
Summary: The first-person shooter - and especially the "futuristic" first-person shooter - has been done, over and over, with little to no changes in gameplay, since almost the beginning of gaming itself.
Summary: Man I had high hopes for this game (and I know I'm not the only one). What a disappointment...don't let the awesome screenshots fool you; this game is basically a very poor Halo imitation. In fact, to compare it to Halo isn't even fair.
Summary: Haze has had a good bit of hype surrounding it, especially considering its a PS3 exclusive FPS that seemed to be loaded with potential. Playing as a futuristic soldier with the ability to supe themselves up to almost superhuman capability thanks to a drug called Nectar.
Summary: 6 years after playing this game, and it is still THE WORST game I have ever played. It had a very unique fighting style, a good story line, and some OK graphics, but the basics were executed poorly. The game itself, I completed in about 5-6 hours tops.