Very bad acting and story line. Not like original. F- overall
20 September 2013
Summary: this game is nothing like the original for the Nintendo 64 or the movie. The acting is bad and the story line is not original. They remade the whole thing and i can say this game sucks bad. not worth the money.... this is s f- game.
Summary: James Bond is a dill hole and makes that more obvious than this game once you play it for a few minutes.shoddy juddery graphics snap with the gameplay and this has already been done years ago on the N64 and it was much better all those years ago when technology was still finding its feet.now all these years later technology has supposedly progressed and got better with age ,a bit like me really I've certainly matured with age ask anyone that knows me .and still the game...
Summary: this item is a waste of money, my husband has a wii and a ps3, he had goldeneye on the wii and when he saw this thought it was a new game as it was released 2 years later, as it turns out it the exact same game its title has been altered which in my books is mis-representing itself. My husband had this for his birthday on sunday 3rd june, he is gutted as am i as i have wasted money on this useless game!!
Summary: I am disppointed with this game was quite poor for any game modes such as online players and they less than 5 or more players in the lobby match as took a long time to waiting for more players to start match and sometime failed online servers with other players and a bit lagging. But A single story mode, 4 split- screens for offline Multiply and M16 mode are good gameplay as more challange in the game. Overall is ok.
Conclusion: if i hadnt ever played modern warfare then i may have given this 2 stars but as it stands this is a dull, repetitive shooter that does not capture the magic of the original goldeneye. the game look dreadful and dated and the gameplay is sloppy. avoid.
Conclusion: very poor, first person like the 90s, slow repetative and dull dull dull. If you die quickly you have to wait 30 seconds for the check point to reload, the guns are the same, even on hard you can be shot thousands of times, the enemy come from places that don't exist or have been cleared. Enough said. oh but wait, the on line game, jerky, poor graphics weak game play terrible.
Summary: First person shooters are my favourite type of game,and i heard great things about the original version of this game which i never got to play. So first up this game is a full retail price but the graphics are ps2 quality.The way your ai enemies die is truly laughable with abysmal animation then the bodies instantly vanish.This brings me to the question do i review this game as an hd remake or do i review it and compare it to the other ps3 shooters?
Summary: dont buy this souless, non event, the weapons feel crap, it has no astmosphere whatsoever,trying to make this game fluid, just to copy cod, it feels like u just blitz away, forget stragety, shoot with a silencer, makes no difference, when u die, ur not even aware of who killed u, another repetive try again game ,over & over, over,like so manyof todays games, no skill required, just repetive crap, since the ps3 came along, in my opinion games have got worse, its all about...
Summary: This game has very few similarities to the Nintendo 64 version, once you get past the first few missions there are only a few nods to the original and the story deviates from the original quite a lot from that point on. I picked up this game because I was interested in how they would go about modernizing the experience for today's consoles.