Summary: Go take the time to search for the other two Dungeon Siege titles. Go ahead, I'll wait. ...did you notice? The people responsible for the creation of the other two titles were Microsoft. Dungeon Siege 1 and 2, both of which were phenomenal games, were made by different people.
Summary: Dungeon Siege 1 was a great game, open, repayable, fun. I got Dungeon Siege III so I could have something to play with my daughter on the PS3 together. When I played it as a single player, the game forced you along a set path.
Summary: about all I have to say about this game is this. 2.5 GB to put it on my HD. I could play Sacred 2 and have a ton more quests and harder levels. I could go back to PS2 and play balder's gate 1 & 2 and it has more content quests better storyline.
Summary: sadly this one just isnt like the others...and when you take that out all that is left is just another shallow rpg thats gonna be forgotten. Im a big fan of all types of rpg, both linear and non, but this game is so linear it just doesnt even seem worth playing.
This is game is a no-no for hardcore CRPGers (I wouldn't even recommend it to a newbie to CRPGs)
Fat Old Sun "Fat Old Sun", Amazon
13 July 2011
Summary: I do not recommend this CRPG, it's not worth a lengthy review as developers put about as much time in developing this as I am in writing this review but I will not allow this game to get away with 5 star reviews.
Summary: i was going to say then years ago that this might have stood up as a decent game, but then I remembered that Baldur's Gate was out ten years ago, and that is so far ahead of this that it is untrue - I just find it remarkable that a company could release an RPG this bad, literally learning nothing...