Summary: I was looking for a good FPS war game to test my strategy skills so I decided to go with Call of Duty 3. I found each successive mission to be more challenging and require quick reflexes. The graphics are good and although it is an older video game, it is still fun to play but you do need to learn the strategies involved to be able to succeed in completing each mission.Overall, its a good game for anyone who likes WW2 FPS games.
Summary: This is a good game, but if you have played any other of the Call of Duty titles, this one may seem a little weak. The game functions seem to be a little slower paced, but if you are hungry for any war, this game will suit you just fine. A little hard to get used to the controls, but not too bad.
Summary: The gameplay in Call of Duty 3 is so similar to the modern day ones, that it is almost berating to see how little the game play mechanics have changed. Actually mechanics have been removed, such as vehicles in multiplayer, in exchange or scorestreaks. The campaign is superior to modern day call of duties, as it follows actual battles and events that occurred, rather than filling the plot with whatever stupidity it thinks of.
Summary: For a PS2 game, and by today's standards in general, this is a great game. The campaign is exciting and has well positioned engagements, the multiplayer includes well thought out classes, vehicles and maps, and there are a variety of extras. This game has basically been copied, and copied, and copied, and copied... but it was innovative and overall, I just love it.
Summary: I have played Call of Duty 3 on my PC and this time I want to try the PS 3 version which turned out to be awesome! Love this game and its story fascinated me since WW2 is a real war known as most ppl. I have black ops series as well, they are fine in graphics and control functions, but to be honest, I love WW2 more than MW.